Emerging consumer markets: the new drivers of global economic growth
Consumption is still largely concentrated in North America and Western Europe, but consumers in emerging markets are stepping onto the world stage in greater numbers.
Erik Johnson covers consumer markets and housing indicators and produces the optimistic scenario of the IHS Global Insight quarterly U.S. macroeconomic forecasting model. He received his undergraduate degree in economics from Colby College.
The American consumer is no longer the primary driver of world economic growth, a fact that holds profound implications for international trade patterns and supply chain dynamics.
For now, consumption is still largely concentrated in North America and Western Europe, but consumers in emerging markets are stepping onto the world stage in greater numbers. These new consumers are making a noticeable impression on multinational corporations, which view them as "low-hanging fruit" compared to their fatigued and frugal counterparts in the developed countries. Indeed, retailers increasingly view the sluggish U.S. and Western European consumer markets as a battleground for market share, whereas they see emerging markets, with their rapidly growing consumer demand, as a more attractive opportunity for growth.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Domestic consumption to world GDP (percent)Enlarge this image
BRIC consumption accelerates
The U.S. consumer may still reign supreme in total and per-capita spending, but growth in the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) and consumer spending is being eclipsed by that of emerging markets, most notably Brazil, Russia, India, and China (the so-called "BRIC" countries). Since 2007, in fact, the global economy has entered a transitional phase in which Chinese and Indian consumers are exerting increasing influence on international trade.
Consider that since the end of the "Great Recession" in June 2009, U.S. consumer spending growth adjusted for inflation has averaged 2.2 percent. Meanwhile, consumer spending growth adjusted for inflation in India and China has exceeded 7 percent each year since 2006.
Figure 1 illustrates this shift in consumption to emerging markets. U.S. consumption as a percentage of world GDP peaked at approximately 22 percent in 2002, and it has steadily declined since then. Consumer spending in Western Europe reached almost 18 percent of world GDP in 2004 and has since fallen at roughly the same pace.
This trend is expected to continue. IHS Global Insight's Global Scenario and Global Consumer Markets econometric models predict that by 2015, U.S. and Western European consumer spending combined will account for only 26 percent of world GDP, down considerably from a 38.5-percent share in 2002. Compare this to the BRIC countries' consumer spending: after averaging 4.4 percent from 1995?2005, it accounted for 8.1 percent of world GDP in 2010 and is projected to reach nearly 12 percent by 2015.
Demographics, economics drive change
While the Great Recession, the current European debt debacle, and anemic growth in both Europe and the United States may have exacerbated this shift toward emerging market consumption, there are strong, underlying demographic and economic forces driving it.
For example, consumer spending represents approximately 70 percent of the United States' gross domestic product, while Western European consumers account for slightly less than 60 percent of that region's GDP. The developing world is less consistent. China's consumption- to-GDP ratio is low, at 36 percent, but India's is one of the highest in the world—on par with that of Western Europe.
Foreign trade (imports plus exports) has been playing a smaller role in the BRIC countries than in Western Europe and the United States, where governments are trying to promote export growth to enhance their economic outlook in the face of weakening domestic consumer demand. Figure 2 illustrates the growing importance of trade to Western economies even as BRIC's ratio of foreign trade to domestic GDP declines.
In the past, the developed economies maintained their high levels of consumer spending by increasing debt and saving less to spur economic growth. But now some emerging nations want consumption to play a greater role in their economies, too. For instance, the Indian government is trying to stimulate consumption by attempting to open up its domestic market to foreign multibrand retail stores. Another example occurred during the last National People's Congress of China, when Beijing made it very clear that one of its top priorities is to have domestic consumption play a stronger role in China's economy, rather than continue to heavily rely on exports and investment to generate growth.
(This reflects the prevailing global imbalance in which the United States, functioning as the de facto reservecurrency nation, is able to accumulate negative fiscal and trade imbalances while China and other emerging nations essentially "fund" those imbalances via their export markets and the purchase of U.S. debt.)
Moreover, there still are profound differences between the consumption patterns of the developed world versus those of the emerging markets. Spending on food, for example, represents a much larger percentage of outlays in less-developed economies than it does in the United States.
However, the rise of the middle class in China, India, and Brazil is having a clear impact on consumption patterns, providing more opportunities for consumer-oriented multinational corporations to increase their revenues and profitability. As more Chinese and Indian families enter the ranks of the upper-middle class, status-related spending behavior may become more widespread and could further alter the composition of global consumer markets.
This phenomenon was described by the American sociologist-economist Thorstein Veblen in his classic book Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. Veblen demonstrated that once people have achieved a certain level of wealth and availability of leisure time, they want to make an impression by showing their newfound status through conspicuous consumption and leisure activities (a principle known as the "Veblen Effect"). This is readily apparent in China and India today, where buying that first air conditioner, car, or elegant Italian purse has a functional purpose but also provides a social signal that the consumer is a member of the nouveau riche.
Innovation looks eastward
Major U.S. corporations are taking notice of this global rebalancing. In his book Spin-Free Economics, IHS Chief Economist Nariman Behravesh writes, "Most multinational corporations consider the Chinese market—especially the booming middle class—to be a centerpiece of their growth strategies over the next couple of decades." But China is not the only place to look for growth. "In some ways, [India] offers even more promising opportunities than China," Behravesh notes.
Evidence of emerging markets' growing importance to multinationals abounds. Dell, for instance, recently launched its ultra-thin XPS 14Z laptop in China, now the largest market for personal computers, one month before it introduced that model in the United States.
Some American automobile manufacturers have been launching new models in Asia, and others, such as Buick and Chevrolet, are planning to do so in the near future. Even Hollywood has responded to this rebalancing of global consumer spending by releasing several American films in Asian markets prior to their U.S. release.
These changing dynamics on the world economic stage will have domestic implications for Western economies. Not so long ago, new product ideas and designs were created in the developed world, produced in emerging markets, and then marketed primarily in the developed markets. But a new paradigm has emerged. Now, the East is often getting "first dibs" on many Western innovations.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.