Warehousing is no longer simply about storing product, says industry guru Kenneth Ackerman. Instead, today's warehouses must focus on supporting the corporate mission and creating value for customers and shareholders.
Author and consultant Kenneth B. Ackerman has a reputation for being a bit of a skeptic. A veteran warehousing man, Ackerman does not easily fall for the latest management fad or technology craze. Instead, his levelheaded advice focuses on time-tested, real-world practices that are grounded in common sense and basic business principles.
Ackerman knows warehousing inside and out. Before becoming a consultant, he was CEO of Distribution Centers Inc., a warehousing company that was later acquired by the third-party logistics service provider Exel. After selling the warehousing business, he joined the management consulting practice of Coopers & Lybrand. A year later, he started his own management advisory service.
Over the course of his long career, Ackerman has often picked up the pen to educate his fellow professionals. He co-wrote his first book on warehousing, Understanding Today's Distribution Center, with R.W. Gardner and Lee P. Thomas back in 1972. Other works include Warehousing Profitably and Fundamentals of Supply Chain Management, co-authored with Art van Bodegraven. He also edits and publishes Warehousing Forum, a subscription-based newsletter. This year, he updated Warehousing Profitably for its third edition.
In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, Ackerman discussed the current and future role of warehousing in the supply chain.
Name: Kenneth B. Ackerman Title: President Organization: K. B. Ackerman Company Education: Princeton University, Harvard Business School Business experience: CEO of Distribution Centers Inc.; Coopers & Lybrand; Founder, K. B. Ackerman Company CSCMP member: since 1966 Professional affiliations: past president, Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals; founder, Warehousing Education and Research Council; Ohio Warehousemen's Association; International Warehouse Logistics Association; Young Presidents Organization; Opera Columbus
You write in your book Warehousing Profitably that "warehousing is destined to move from a product-centric business to an idea-centric activity." Could you explain what you mean by that statement and give an example of an idea-centric activity?
An idea-centric warehouse manager is one who recognizes ... [that] the role of the warehouse is to support the corporate mission. If that corporation is dedicated to rapid growth, the warehouse must be prepared to support that growth. If the emphasis is on superior service, the warehouse must be managed to achieve zero defects and perfect orders. If the company intends to be a low-price leader, the warehouse must be dedicated to reducing costs.
Has globalization changed how supply chain managers view warehousing?
The warehousing function is not really portable, so globalization has less influence here than it does in manufacturing. However, those supply chain managers who have to establish warehouses overseas must look at how cultural distinctions could change the way the facility is managed. For example, some years ago in Colombia, I saw a rest break where a woman in a starched uniform carried a tray of coffee cups to the workers.
You talk about the information revolution in your book. Would you say it's necessary today for even the smallest warehouse to have warehouse management software in place?
Yes. If you don't have [a warehouse management system], you probably don't have a workable locator system. If you don't have one, you may have US $30-per-hour warehouse workers writing shipping documents with pen and ink. If you don't have directed putaway, decisions about storage location will be made by lift truck drivers rather than by management. So without a WMS, your warehouse would be operating at a higher cost and lower efficiency than it would otherwise, and you will find it more difficult to compete.
Do you expect to see more or fewer warehouses built in North America in the next few years?
It all depends on where you are in North America. In Columbus, Ohio, [USA] the surplus of attractive empty space has pushed pricing down to a point where it is more economical to rent an existing building than to build a new one. This is not true in every city, but unfortunately it is true in many markets.
You note in your book that that many companies today find it difficult to retain warehouse workers. What can companies do to keep their best workers?
The labor situation is not really different for warehousing than for any other job. It starts by picking the right people. Once selected, they must be motivated and receive proper recognition for jobs that are well done. Management should recognize that an order selector in a warehouse has a job that is more rewarding than working on an assembly line or driving a truck. It has more variety, and it requires judgment as well as skill.
You write that the emphasis in warehousing should be on "creating increased value for customers and shareholders." Can you give me an example of how a warehouse can increase value?
Here's one example: A leading apparel retailer has grown its company by providing logistics services that are vastly superior to the competition. When a new fashion is discovered in France, a sample is taken to China, where it is rapidly manufactured, then moved by air to a central distribution center, priced, and reshipped by air to the retail stores. The ability to use superior logistics services has contributed to the value of the retail corporation. Fast-response retail chains combine premium transportation and efficient warehousing with flexible manufacturing. The result is that a buyer can turn a new fashion concept into goods on the store shelves in a matter of weeks while competitors may take months to accomplish the same thing.
Editor's Note:Warehousing Profitably (ISBN# 978-0-9829940-0-9) is available from Ackerman Publications in Columbus, Ohio, USA. For more information or to order, visit the website: www.warehousing-forum.com.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.