As supply chains grow increasingly complex and data-driven, it can be difficult to sort through the barrage of information to identify the best action to take or decision to make. But what if you had software that could learn to recognize patterns and make suggestions based on past experiences?
Dr. Noel P. Greis, director of the Kenan Institute's Center for Logistics and Digital Strategy at the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, has been working to develop business intelligence software that can do just that.
Greis, who has a background in mathematics and engineering, says her interest in analytical software dates back to her work in graduate school on systems theory and design. Today she continues that work as she researches the use of business intelligence engines in the supply chain. In particular, she has focused on the use of "experience-based" analytics to improve decision making.
In addition to her work in business intelligence, Greis is the co-director of the UNC-Tsinghua Center for Logistics and Enterprise Development in Beijing, a joint venture of Tsinghua University's Department of Industrial Engineering and the Kenan-Flagler Business School at UNC. She was also the co-founder of the Global Logistics Research Initiative (GLORI), a worldwide consortium of 10 universities that conducted collaborative research on intelligent technologies in logistics.
In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, Greis discussed software developments that could shape supply chain practices in the future.
Name: Noel P. Greis Title: Director, Center for Logistics and Digital Strategy (U.S.), and Co-Director, UNC-Tsinghua Research Center for Logistics and Enterprise Development (joint venture between University of North Carolina and Tsinghua University in China) Organization: Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Education: Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics, Brown University; Master of Arts in Engineering and Master of Science in Engineering, Princeton University; Doctorate in Civil Engineering, Princeton University Work History: Assistant Professor of Operations, Technology, and Innovation Management, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; member of technical staff, Bell Laboratories and Bell Communications Research CSCMP Member: Since 2000
What is meant by the term "experience-based" analytics?
Humans learn by experience. Our brain captures these experiences as sets of associations—for example "stove" and "hot." When faced with a decision, we generally draw upon our past experiences to search for analogues with similarities to the current situation.
Experience-based analytics use a type of pattern-recognition technology to accomplish the same tasks as our brains. We utilize software to capture and represent past "experience" and to help us make decisions in similar situations.
How will experience-based analytics impact supply chain operations?
As supply chains have become more complex and data-rich, humans are encountering limits in the amount of information that they are able to process. Experience-based analytics are able to augment humans' ability to process information in data-intensive applications like the supply chain.
For example, procurement officers in large, multinational organizations and government agencies process thousands of orders daily. These organizations have accumulated large amounts of history about their suppliers and how well they perform. Using experience-based analytics, we can "match" the best supplier with an incoming order based on the company's accumulated experiences about which suppliers have performed well with similar types of orders in the past, as distinguished by size, lead times, and other factors.
One of your research projects involved a battlefield supply chain management solution for Boeing. Can you describe that solution and how it came about?
Mention Boeing and most people think of its commercial aircraft products—the 747 or 787. However, developing large-scale systems that provide logistics support to the U.S. military is a very large part of Boeing's business. As Napoleon learned during his 1812 march on Moscow, the complex logistics of supplying everything from fuel and food to spare parts and ammunition to the battlefield can make or break a war. Success depends on strategic forward positioning of critical assets.
In the mid 2000s, the U.S. government turned to emerging technologies to try to solve these complex supply problems for the Iraq War. For Boeing, we created a system that provides battlefield situational awareness for logistics command-and-control. The key was real-time "sensing" of the operational status of in-theater vehicles and other assets and the fusion of that data with other contextual data. Our analytics "built" resupply missions that assured that the right amount of assets reached forward positions when and where they were needed, as safely as possible. The system was able to initiate resupply missions autonomously or semiautonomously. These experience-based analytics incorporated a technology called associative memory that was developed by Saffron Technology, one of our technology partners. Associative memory is a type of machine learning that captures the relationships between past experiences and present situations.
What can we expect of business intelligence software for supply chain management in the next two years?
A new information-rich environment and smarter analytics are changing the calculus of business decision making. Being able to take control of and respond to changes in the supply chain, especially disruptive events, requires more than visibility. We are starting to take advantage of tools that are better able to respond more quickly and effectively in dynamic environments.
For example, the Internet has matured as a connective technology, bringing with it an explosion of data. Data velocity is increasing and data types are proliferating. The virtual integration of the extended global enterprise is possible, and the availability and low cost of powerful multiprocessor computers and algorithms provide the hardware and software necessary to manipulate large volumes of data in near real time. Cloud computing allows companies to access services and data in real time via the Internet. And new software tools—the "experienced-based analytics" we've been discussing—are being developed that can learn and even make autonomous or semiautonomous decisions. This capability is still several years in the future, but we are building prototypes in our lab right now.
How likely will it be that business intelligence software will be able to predict "supply chain problems" before they occur?
Very likely. We are currently building software tools that are able to anticipate problems in the future. Managing a global supply chain is a complex sequencing act. At each stage of the supply chain, inventories must be kept supplied and in balance. Unlike traditional modeling approaches, we view supply chain coordination as a pattern-recognition problem. At any point in time, the supply chain can be represented by a large set of diverse and disparate data of "experiences," including inventory levels at suppliers, manufacturers, distribution centers, warehouses, and retail outlets; expected customer demands; and other factors that influence demand, such as promotions. Our analytics observe the supply chain over time and "learn" its dynamic behavior as a set of patterns. The tool's learned experience enables us to recognize situations that anticipate stock-outs or other supply chain failures.
Will business intelligence technology revolutionize supply chain practices?
Our appetite for business intelligence tools that help make sense of large volumes of business data will continue to grow. This is especially true because the costs of data acquisition and storage will continue to decline. And although the timeline is uncertain, business intelligence technology can be expected to enable great strides in supply chain practices. Right now we hear a lot about the "Internet of Things," where everything and everyone will be connected and able to communicate through a network enabled by the Internet—in effect merging the cyber and physical worlds. The Internet of Things is not just one technology; rather, it's a portfolio of technologies. Among them, business intelligence technology is an important first step.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.