As the economy decelerates and consumer spending cools, IHS Markit predicts that U.S. freight transportation demand will not be as strong as it was in 2021.
Despite another winter wave of COVID infections in early 2022, the underlying conditions affecting U.S. freight demand and the outlook for the rest of the year are quite different from what supply chain managers were facing a year ago. While IHS Markit is forecasting year-over-year growth for the freight market, we believe that it will be at a slower pace than in 2021.
To be sure, the U.S. is still in a pandemic, and consumers are again pulling back from spending on “socially dense” services. But despite the fact that the omicron variant set new infections records in the United States, the 2022 COVID-related disruptions are only an echo of those from 2020 and 2021. Instead, most of the economy (and schools) are still largely open, and goods demand has not softened as much, or as quickly, as many analysts assumed it would a year ago. As a result, the freight system currently is handling near-record volumes of cargo.
However, we expect the surge in goods spending will soon fade, as government stimulus program payments have dwindled and no new pandemic fiscal stimulus packages are on the horizon. Furthermore, as the infection rate eases post-omicron, we expect to see a gradual shift of consumption away from durable goods and back toward services. Figure 1 shows that the above-trend goods consumption of the last two years is about over, while services consumption has yet to recover to pre-pandemic levels. We expect this shift toward more services consumption will decrease demand for freight as we progress through 2022.
[Figure 1] Forecast of U.S. consumer spending on goods and services Enlarge this image
Freight demand will also be affected by a deceleration in inventory restocking by businesses. Businesses were able to substantially rebuild their inventory before year-end 2021. While this helped boost Q4 2021 gross domestic product (GDP) growth, it reduces business’ need to restock inventory in 2022 (with a few exceptions, such as the auto industry). This, in turn, weakens the outlook for business investment and associated freight demand in 2022.
As a result, IHS Markit has revised its forecast for 2022 U.S. real gross domestic product (GDP) growth down to 4.1%. From a long-term perspective, this percentage still represents strong growth, but it is 1.6% slower than the economy grew in 2021. Therefore, our analysis of the underlying 2022 macroeconomic and industry forecasts prepared in January sees the overall baseline for freight demand still increasing, but at significantly slower pace as we move through 2022.
Modal outlook
The forecasted pace of growth for the various transportation modes will depend on conditions affecting each mode’s customers as well as continued competition between modes. For example, the booms for segments such as the at-home food and exercise equipment are over. Meanwhile the auto industry is still playing catch up in 2022, trying to recover from the severe chip shortage, which constrained production and shipping in 2021.
Among the key elements affecting modal freight demand in 2022 are the strength of the e-commerce portions of the retail economy and the outlook for commodity sectors such as energy and agriculture exports.
IHS Markit’s analysis shows continued strength in trucking and air cargo demand in 2022, driven by e-commerce shipping. Trucking demand will also benefit in 2022 from rail intermodal’s lingering difficulties handling higher demand volume. There will be weaknesses in bulk energy and construction commodity markets not offset by the increased pace of exports, which will affect carriers serving these markets and benefit shippers of related commodities.
The structural mismatch between freight network capacity and demand that has led to so much congestion and disruption in the last two years will linger well into 2022. Freight velocity will continue to be reduced, and the workforce level will continue to be inadequate to handle e-commerce business and evolving just-in-case supply chain inventory management practices.
It is essential to note that these forecasts include some important assumptions, including that the combination of vaccinations and natural immunity will prove effective against any new variants of COVID. As a result, the forecasts assume that we will see further opening of the economy during 2022. Also assumed is there will be no substantial additional federal fiscal stimulus programs following the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021, nor any significant trade policy shifts.
The risks around these forecasts are high given that there are many remaining unknowns, including the potential for major geopolitical disruptions in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. New virus variants could also potentially arise, which could extend the pandemic. There are also many unknowns around consumer sentiment, workforce participation, and additional government fiscal and monetary policy shifts in 2022.
Implications for U.S. freight markets
The economic conditions driving 2022 freight demand are not a repeat of the booming goods consumption that overwhelmed supply chains in 2021, nor will there be a reversion to the pre-pandemic 2019 composition of freight demand.
Instead, the outlook for 2022 freight volumes is for weaker growth, driven by decelerating economic growth, mostly-already-rebuilt inventories, and slowing consumer goods spending. For supply chain managers, this forecast implies a slow step down from the record-high 2021 rates in intermodal, air, and some trucking segments. However, the potential rate relief is limited, as carriers are facing persistently higher costs for fuel, labor, and equipment, as well as many inefficiencies in their operations. Capacity and operational limits will still impact most modes in 2022, especially in the first half of the year, as container port congestion has lingered through January.
For shippers, the pace of sales volume growth will be more moderate than in 2021, allowing for better management of volumes, with a few exceptions—such as for those export commodities that were impeded by operational and equipment availability in 2021.
For carriers, 2022 brings the prospect of making progress on improving operations and better satisfying customers. Yet, they could also face potentially lower margins, as the extreme supply/demand imbalance that favored many carriers with high spot rates in 2021 will dissipate.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.