Top 10 Supply Chain Threats: Zac Rogers from Colorado State University on the threat of spiraling costs
Supply chain and logistics costs are skyrocketing as demand for transportation and warehousing capacity outstrips supply. Is there any relief in sight?
For links and show notes, mouse over the player and click the .
Transcript
About this week's guest
Zachary S. Rogers is an assistant professor of operations and supply chain management at Colorado State University. His primary research interests include the financial impact of supply chain sustainability, emerging logistics technologies, supply chain cyber security and various other emerging purchasing and logistics issues. He is also a researcher and co-author of the monthly Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report. Rogers’ work has appeared in multiple academic journals, corporate white papers, trade publications, and conference proceedings. He is also a frequent speaker at both academic and practitioner-oriented conferences. Rogers earned his B.S. and M.B.A. degrees at the University of Nevada, Reno and his PhD in supply chain management from Arizona State University. Prior to returning to academia, Rogers worked as a purchasing agent for a large hotel-resort and as an operations manager for Quidsi, a subsidiary of Amazon.
David Maloney, Editorial Director, CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly00:02
The Covid-19 pandemic showed us just how vulnerable supply chains are. Today we face many threats: shipping delays, a lack of workers, failing infrastructure, transportation rates that are out of control, cybersecurity threats. and of course, a worldwide pandemic that is still very much with us. But with each of these threats come opportunities. Welcome to this limited podcast series from CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly, the Top 10 Supply Chain Threats.
This podcast is sponsored by Trax, the global leader in transportation spend management. Trax elevates traditional freight audit with a combination of industry-leading cloud based technology and the industry's most global services to deliver enterprisewide value and customer satisfaction. In addition, Trax's invoice payment-automation service, TraxPays Plus, ensures efficient payment management, reduces payment issues, improves carrier loyalty, and increases cash flow. The customers of Trax represent the world's most complex supply chains, and they chose Trax to achieve end-to-end visibility and control of their global transportation costs, improve transportation data quality, and call upon logistics management optimization strategies. Visit Trax at www.traxtech.com.
Today we focus on the threat posed by increasing costs. Here is your moderator for this segment, Supply Chain Quarterly's executive editor, Susan Lacefield.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly01:45
Welcome to the latest episode of Supply Chain Quarterly's podcast on the top 10 threats facing supply chains. Today, we are looking at the risks and challenges associated with rising costs, and to help us unpeel that onion is Zac Rogers, who is an assistant professor at Colorado State University. Zac has a really good read on the costs facing the logistics industry through his work with the monthly Logistics Managers' Index, also known as the LMI. Zac, for those of our listeners who are not familiar with the LMI, can you give us the brief elevator speech of what it is?
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 02:18
Absolutely. So, the LMI is something we started five years ago—this is actually our fifth-year anniversary—we started at CSCMP, yeah, so we're all very excited. And so essentially, the LMI is a change index, where we go and we talk to a few hundred managers every month—usually director level and above, so have a 20,000-foot-view of of the supply chain—and ask them about eight key metrics. We ask them about inventory levels and costs, and then for both warehousing and transportation, we ask them about cost, utilization, and capacity. And I always say is it going up, is it going down, or is it staying the same? And we use those answers, monthly, to create a diffusion index, wherein anything above 50 means growth. anything below 50 means contraction. It's very similar to to the PMI.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly03:04
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 03:04
And actually, the reason we established the LMI is because really, you know, the PMI when they started that in the '60s, it was, it made sense to—let's look at manufacturing, and inventories and things like that, to measure the economy. Well, when we started this in 2016, we thought, we need to look at transportation and service levels, because the economy has really fundamentally shifted. Plus, we really capture both the upstream and downstream parts of the supply chain, so not just the manufacturing industrial side, but consumers as well. So we've been doing it for five years, and it gives us a pretty good read on the direction that the economy is going, because if you think about it, before you can buy something, we had to drive it there, we had to store it somewhere, we had to hold it in inventory. So it's a pretty good economic indicator.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly03:48
So what are the responses to the survey indicating. You know, costs are already high. Are they gonna rise even more?
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 03:56
It seems that way, you know. So, if you look at the overall index, in the most recent report that came out, it was a 73.8.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly04:04
Okay.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 04:05
And if you put the last three months together—so basically summer, June, July, August—the overall average is 74.4, which is the highest three-month moving average that we've ever had in the five months. So, if people listening to this thought, "Man, my supply chain seemed really expensive this summer"—it was! It wasn't just you. And a lot of that is driven by costs. For instance, warehousing prices were at an 88 in August. Now, the scale only goes up to 100, so 88's pretty high.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly04:34
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 04:34
It was also that high in July. And it's the highest level we've ever had. July and August, back-to-back months, we had consecutive highest readings ever for warehousing. Now that's really interesting because warehousing typically is not that volatile, especially if you compare it to something like transportation. Transportation is up, it's down, it's all over the place. We're used to big swings. Warehousing prices, if you go back and look at the last couple of years, it's really been in like a 10- to 15-point band the whole time. It doesn't get too low, doesn't get too high. Well, what's happened is, we've had a capacity crunch now for so long. Warehousing capacity has been in a state of contraction for now 12 consecutive months.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly05:13
Wow.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 05:13
And really, there's only one month of the whole pandemic—of the 18 months of the pandemic, it contracted for 17 months. And it was at a 50.5 in August of 2020. So, just like just barely—someone built five warehouses outside of Atlanta, and it just barely went up.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly05:30
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 05:30
But it's been negative since then, and so what's interesting is, we're starting to see warehousing prices move quickly in a way we'd normally see transportation prices move. And part of the reason for that is really, it's just exhaustion in warehouse networks.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly05:45
Okay.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 05:46
So, it's been contracting and contracting and contracting for a year, and really a year and a half, and we're starting to see the marginal, increase costs of less capacity go up and up. So essentially, for every bit of capacity that we don't have, it's becoming more and more expensive. You know, I kind of compare it to, a supply chain right now is, you know, when you're in college—I'm around college students all the time, I teach them—you know, I can tell, you know, sometimes they're up all night, right? Because studying for one test. And you can stay up all night one night in a row and probably be mostly fine. I mean, I can tell they don't look totally right, but I can tell they're mostly fine. But if you do that for a week, you're not going to be fine.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly06:30
No, you get psychotic.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 06:30
And that's essentially what's happening with supply chains right now.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly06:33
We have pyschotic supply chains.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 06:34
Yeah, we—it's like we've been up all year, essentially, and we're really starting to get tired, and you're seeing that stress on capacity really reflected in prices.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly06:46
Okay, so what can supply chain managers do to mitigate these costs? Is there anything they can do, or are they just got to ride it out?
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 06:53
Well, what do you think about having Christmas in February? Do you think? Skip the lines? No, I think that, really, it's got to be strategies where you play to your strengths, and you know, there's no way to avoid some things, right? Like, okay, we know, the cost of a container right now is $20,000, going from China to the West Coast, which, you know, is about 40% of the value of the goods in the container, where normally it should be 4%, so there's a problem. We know that things are slower. And essentially, we see firms kind of shifting between a couple of different strategies.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly07:33
Okay,
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 07:33
If you look at someone like a Best Buy, Best Buy decided, Well, we're just going to stock up like crazy and carry way more inventory than normal, so that hopefully, we don't miss many orders and we can really fill demand in Q4. You saw Toyota do the same thing. You know, Toyota actually outsold GM in Q2 for the first time ever in the U.S., because they stocked up on—
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly07:55
[Indistinct]
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 07:55
Yes, exactly. The most JIT [just-in-time ] company on the planet decided, Let's not do JIT.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly08:00
Right, that says something.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 08:01
Yeah, it really does. They're always one step ahead of us, those guys at Toyota. And so, some companies have sort of done that, where, "Okay, we'll build up and build up and build up." Other companies have tried the cost-cutting methods. It doesn't seem like that has worked as well, though. Now, is building up inventories, you know, forever sustainable? Probably not. You know, we eventually, you know, we've gone from just-in-time to just-in-case. I think probably we'll settle somewhere in the middle, right?
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly08:31
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 08:32
Right now, we're sort of at the other extreme, the other end of the spectrum, where people are ordering more than they need, because they know, "Okay, well, it's going to be 60 days for it to get over here, it's going to wait for nine days off the, in the San Pedro Bay...
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly08:45
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 08:46
"I'm just gonna place a double order, because who knows when my next order is going to come in?" Eventually, that will, that will slow back down. And really, what we're seeing now is companies experimenting, and really trying to calibrate their strategies for this sort of new reality. You know, we went into the pandemic with really [these] sort of pre-Covid ideas about how things work—about how quickly a ship could get here from China, about the cost of the container, about how quickly a rail car could get across the country and not be stuck in Chicago...
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly09:14
Right.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 09:15
all of these sort of ideas, and so we build our supply chains in these assumptions, and now those assumptions have changed. And so we are, right now, dealing with the post-Covid world with pre-Covid supply chains, and eventually we'll get to the post-Covid supply chain and be calibrated in a way where we can deal with the new realities.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly09:35
Great. This has been a fascinating discussion, Zac. I really appreciate you coming down and talking to us at CSCMP Edge about what's going on in the...
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 09:43
Well, I mean, you guys are strategically located right next to lunch. This is great.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly09:47
Right. Well go enjoy your lunch, and for our listeners out there, go and subscribe to the podcast.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 09:53
Absolutely. Thank you very much. And again, the-dash-L-M-I-dot-com.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly09:58
Okay.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 09:58
All of our reports [are] at the-dash-L-M-I-dot-com, including the old ones that I kind of don't want anybody to look at.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly10:04
Right? It's a good it's a good case, a good look at what's changed.
Zac Rogers, Assistant Professor of Supply Chain Management, Colorado State University 10:08
Absolutely, yeah. Thank you.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly10:10
Thank you.
David Maloney, Editorial Director, CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly10:12
Thank you for joining us for this podcast from CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly, the Top 10 Supply Chain Threats. We encourage you to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
Benefits for Amazon's customers--who include marketplace retailers and logistics services customers, as well as companies who use its Amazon Web Services (AWS) platform and the e-commerce shoppers who buy goods on the website--will include generative AI (Gen AI) solutions that offer real-world value, the company said.
The launch is based on “Amazon Nova,” the company’s new generation of foundation models, the company said in a blog post. Data scientists use foundation models (FMs) to develop machine learning (ML) platforms more quickly than starting from scratch, allowing them to create artificial intelligence applications capable of performing a wide variety of general tasks, since they were trained on a broad spectrum of generalized data, Amazon says.
The new models are integrated with Amazon Bedrock, a managed service that makes FMs from AI companies and Amazon available for use through a single API. Using Amazon Bedrock, customers can experiment with and evaluate Amazon Nova models, as well as other FMs, to determine the best model for an application.
Calling the launch “the next step in our AI journey,” the company says Amazon Nova has the ability to process text, image, and video as prompts, so customers can use Amazon Nova-powered generative AI applications to understand videos, charts, and documents, or to generate videos and other multimedia content.
“Inside Amazon, we have about 1,000 Gen AI applications in motion, and we’ve had a bird’s-eye view of what application builders are still grappling with,” Rohit Prasad, SVP of Amazon Artificial General Intelligence, said in a release. “Our new Amazon Nova models are intended to help with these challenges for internal and external builders, and provide compelling intelligence and content generation while also delivering meaningful progress on latency, cost-effectiveness, customization, information grounding, and agentic capabilities.”
The new Amazon Nova models available in Amazon Bedrock include:
Amazon Nova Micro, a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses at very low cost.
Amazon Nova Lite, a very low-cost multimodal model that is lightning fast for processing image, video, and text inputs.
Amazon Nova Pro, a highly capable multimodal model with the best combination of accuracy, speed, and cost for a wide range of tasks.
Amazon Nova Premier, the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models
Amazon Nova Canvas, a state-of-the-art image generation model.
Amazon Nova Reel, a state-of-the-art video generation model that can transform a single image input into a brief video with the prompt: dolly forward.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.