Every four years, I watch the Olympics for two weeks. I love seeing the best-of-the-best vie for medals, for records, and for national glory.
Sometimes what is even more compelling than the world-class athletic feats themselves are the human-interest backstories. These personal histories are eye-openers for me. They force me to put aside my preconceived notion that all Olympic athletes are born talented, and that their achievements come to them naturally. Instead, like hurdles in a track competition, many—if not most—Olympic participants have had obstacles to overcome.
Two examples come quickly to mind. The first is Oscar Pistorius, the South African paraplegic. Because of a medical condition, his legs were amputated halfway between his knees and ankles when he was 11 months old. He runs on specially designed blades. Clearly, he had much to overcome, not the least of which was getting the South African Olympic Committee to allow him to participate alongside the "able bodied."
The second example is Katie Bell. In 2007 at the U.S. College Big Ten Championships, the 4-foot-11-inch, 95-pound platform diver got "lost" in a handstand dive off the 10-meter platform and landed flat on her stomach, dislocating some of her ribs and collapsing a lung. Thanks to therapy (both physical and psychological), she made it back onto the diving platform and eventually to the 2012 Olympic Games. She did not let her injuries or her fear stop her from achieving her best.
We are not all Olympic athletes, but each of us wants to excel in our chosen area of expertise. But we also have obstacles, preferences, likes, dislikes, and sometimes even fears. Think about these factors in relation to your job performance. Are they silently holding you back from what you want? Are they keeping you from taking your game to its highest level? It's time to identify these obstacles and deal with them, rather than allow your preferences and fears to dictate your career path.
Commit to change
In our heart of hearts, we know what our obstacles and fears are. Maybe it is public speaking, giving criticism, confronting co-workers or suppliers, or dealing with dissention. These are the things that keep us up at night, that make our pulse race, that make our mouths dry. These are the things we need to do but don't do (or don't do well) because they make us uncomfortable or fearful.
Or we may be doing the correct thing but are doing it in the wrong way because of individual preferences, likes, and dislikes. An example would be speaking too bluntly ("We are all adults; she should be able to deal with it.") or carrying out a task but not following the rules ("Who has time for all that paperwork?").
These shortcomings are hard to detect because they don't bother us like they do others. They are insidious that way. If you are prone to such problems, hopefully they will be highlighted in your annual review or will be brought to your attention in candid conversations with co-workers. Take this feedback to heart. It is a gift, and you need to make constructive use of it.
Like New Year's resolutions, you need to commit to goals and put them on paper (or computer screen, as the case may be). Write down the top two or three things that you believe are holding you back. Only select two or three, at most. That is all a person can effectively work on at one time.
Bear in mind that the list will **italic{never} be finished. Once you are satisfied that one of the obstacles on the list has been conquered, another one will almost certainly pop up to replace it. Your process should reflect the philosophy of kaizen, or constant, continuous improvement. With time, the items on your list will be more about refining a skill rather than conquering a fear.
Eleanor Roosevelt, First Lady of the United States from 1933 to 1945, said, "Do one thing every day that scares you." By doing so, she believed, people could overcome their fears and gain confidence in themselves. In our context, that means applying yourself daily to tackling your issues. With your list in mind, marshal your resources. If your fear of public speaking is limiting your career, enroll in Toastmasters. If your difficulty giving criticism is holding you back, find a book about providing constructive feedback. Other possible learning resources include community colleges, online courses, libraries, and firms that offer training or management seminars.
Some companies have a training and development budget that could cover classes that may help you to address your issues. Explore this option. It shows that you are interested in improving your skills and contributing more to the company.
Stay on track
It also helps to apply the old supply chain axiom, "If it can be measured, it can be improved." Track your efforts so you can see your progress. Unfortunately, many of the issues you may be tackling will be of a qualitative nature, which are not easy to quantify. Regardless, you need to record your efforts and your progress—and sometimes the lack thereof.
As an executive coach, I help my clients refine their skills and overcome their obstacles. Part of that process is holding them accountable for the progress they commit to make. I cannot over-emphasize how much being accountable to another person will positively affect your outcomes. Tell someone—a friend, spouse, co-worker, or online support group—about your goals and ask them to hold you to them. Just as having an exercise partner makes you go to the gym regularly, having a support person will provide an incentive for you to follow through on your self-improvement plan.
Most importantly, do not allow yourself to become daunted by your personal weaknesses or past mistakes. Olympian Oscar Pistorius' sporting motto is: "You're not disabled by the disabilities you have, you are able by the abilities you have." Use your abilities to overcome what is holding you back.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.