Supply chain managers might think that demographics and consumer dynamics matter only to economists, marketers, and government policymakers. But in fact these factors have a tremendous impact on international trade patterns and distribution logistics. That's why the answers to questions like, Where are the consumers? Who are they? and What are they buying? are critically important to supply chain managers.
Several global demographic trends have productivity and supply chain implications. This article will focus on two that deserve particular attention: urbanization and aging.
The immediate impact of these trends is noticeable, albeit not sizable, yet the implications for both the medium and the long term are considerable. As the consumer base broadens and diversifies across many countries due to the rise of emerging markets' purchasing power, the impact of these global demographic trends will become more evident.
Going urban
Urbanization rates (or the percentage of the population that resides in an urban setting) had stabilized in most developed countries by the 1900s. The U.S. urbanization rate did not surpass the 50 percent mark until 1920, and by the 1990s three out four Americans lived in an urban area. Strong drivers of "going urban" are industrialization, higher agriculture productivity, immigration, and the attraction of the "bright lights" of the city.
But the United States isn't the only country where this is happening. The world's urbanization rate surpassed the 50 percent mark sometime between the year 2000 and 2004. According to the United Nations, China and India had roughly the same urbanization rates in 1990 (around 25 percent). India currently is in the low 30 percent zone, while China is expected to surpass the 50 percent mark by 2015. By 2025, China's urbanization rate is projected to be around 60 percent, India is likely to reach 36 percent, and the United States will be slightly shy of 90 percent. (See Figure 1.)
Urbanization holds important implications for supply chains. The increasing levels of urbanization and the concurrent development of "megacities" worldwide will place greater pressure on supply chain managers to ship goods via parcel delivery to consumers, to better manage intracity and intercity logistics, and to further increase productivity in the food supply chain.
Lower fertility and longer lives
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, many demographers and economists were asking whether it would be possible to prevent the world's population from reaching 25 billion by the end of the 21st century. Instead, as shown in Figure 2, population growth has been slowing. According to most recent projections, world population is expected to reach 10 billion by 2050 and then level off.
The reason for that change is the falling fertility rate. Women and families are choosing to have fewer children than in the past. Approximately 70 percent of all nations have child-bearing rates below or approaching the replacement level of 2.1 children per woman of child-bearing age. Several Asian developing economies, including India, Vietnam, and Thailand, have lower fertility rates than do many Western European countries. Key drivers of falling fertility rates include increased family planning, higher levels of educational attainment for women, more women entering the work force, and, in general, the changing role of women in society.
Declining fertility rates are having a remarkable impact on age distribution in both emerging and developed economies. The traditional "population pyramid," where a large percentage of the population is in the younger age cohorts and a smaller percentage is in the elderly age cohorts, is being turned on its head.
In many countries, populations are noticeably aging due to falling fertility rates. In China, for example, the one-child policy has taken its toll. (The country's increased levels of urbanization and industrialization also contribute to declining fertility rates—there is less need for families to have multiple offspring who can work the family farm.)
Together with lower fertility rates, longer lifespans due to improved work conditions, health care, and sanitary conditions are contributing to an aging population and a smaller labor force. The net result is that many emerging and developed economies will have a smaller percentage of their populations supporting those who are too young or too old to work. Most notably, Japan's working-age population has started to shrink, and the number of deaths outnumbered births in 2006. In Germany, the decline in population statistics in the first decade of this century has been termed "schrumpfende Gesellschaft" (shrinking society).
In line with this trend, population growth has been stagnant in emerging European countries. Even though these countries are predicted to see population growth this decade that is three times faster than in the previous decade, demographers foresee a major deterioration for the period 2020 to 2030. That's because the collapse of the Soviet Union left the economies of the former Soviet republics in shambles, and birth rates and life expectancies in the region are being dragged down by slow economic improvements and a deteriorating environment.
The population is aging even in sub-Saharan Africa, which has experienced a dramatic reduction in poverty rates since 2000 due to aid from the developed world. Improvements in healthcare, education, and sanitation, meanwhile, have led to more children surviving beyond the age of five. The lower death rate is coupled with the byproduct of the fight against AIDS: Since contraception was introduced, the fertility rate has declined.
The consumer of the future
What will the consumer of the future look like? In most developed and emerging markets, citizens will be older and a smaller percentage of the population will be working. However, several regions (most notably less-developed areas of the world) that are not considered emerging market economies will still have higher population growth rates and a younger age-cohort profile.
The difference in population growth rates in developing countries compared to those in the advanced economies, together with the growth of the emerging middle class in developing nations, will rebalance global trade patterns and impact supply chain dynamics. Increasing levels of urbanization and aging populations are likely to have a dramatic impact on the demand for many products and thus, on what types of products are produced.
In short, the world will need fewer diapers and more health care, hospital services, and food productivity in the coming years. In many emerging-market economies, innovations in food supply chain efficiencies will be paramount, since connecting the food supply to the centers of food demand (urban areas) has been a difficult problem. Supply chain managers will be forced to consider the distribution and logistics issues associated with meeting these changing demands, and they will have to respond accordingly to both the challenges and opportunities they present.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.