Every year for the past four, transportation and logistics professionals have waited for the high priestess of industry data, Rosalyn Wilson, to deliver them from the near-ruins of the Great Recession and into the land of bountiful returns that many had grown accustomed to prior to the downturn.
Judging by the conclusions of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' 24th annual "State of Logistics Report," which Wilson authors, they may have some more time to wait—at least a couple of more years.
The report, which was released June 19 in Washington, D.C., chronicles the nation's logistics output in 2012. In it, Wilson writes that the logistics industry may be experiencing a "new order," characterized by the bump-along-the-bottom growth that has marked the post-recession era. This pattern of sluggish growth will last at least until the end of 2015, she predicts.
"The economy and the logistics sector will slowly regain sustainable momentum, but we will still experience unevenness in growth rates," Wilson writes in the report.
The picture for 2013, at least through mid-year, has a similar look to the past two years, said Wilson, whose data-crunching continued right up to the report's release. As she gathered the data and prepared her narrative, Wilson said she realized "there was not a truly new story to tell."
Recoveries in the housing and automotive sectors have been a welcome positive, she said. Offsetting those strengths, though, have been the impact of the 10-percent across-the-board federal budget cuts mandated under "sequestration"; a rise in payroll tax deductions to historical norms; higher operating costs for logistics service providers; and a global economic slowdown, she added.
Among the report's findings for 2012:
• U.S. logistics costs reached $1.33 trillion, a 3.4-percent gain from 2011 levels. The rate of increase was less than half of the year-on-year increase from 2010 to 2011. Similarly, transportation costs borne by users of the logistics system rose 3 percent, about half the rate of increase reported from 2010 to 2011. Logistics costs as a percentage of nominal gross domestic product (GDP)—a ratio often cited to measure the supply chain's efficiency in moving the nation's output—came in at 8.5 percent, the same as in 2011. These trends reflect the impact of slow economic growth as well as gains in productivity, asset utilization, and inventory management made by the supply chain sector since the recession ended, according to Wilson. These improvements will allow the ratio to remain at low levels even as business and shipping activity rises through the years, she said. The ratio "compares quite favorably to that of our trading partners," she said.
• Inventory carrying costs rose 4 percent, as rising inventory levels in part neutralized the continued decline in interest rates. Business inventories rose in every quarter but the second. Inventory levels in the first quarter surpassed the levels of the third quarter of 2008, considered to be the worst quarter of the recession. Retail, wholesale, and manufacturing inventories all rose in 2012, with retail inventories increasing by 8.3 percent, more than double the increase of wholesale inventories and more than six times the rise in manufacturing inventories.
For all their efforts to reduce inventory levels through better forecasting methods, retailers still found themselves overstocked as retail sales began flagging in May after a strong start to the year, Wilson said. Over time, retailers will become more adept at pushing inventory back upstream through the supply chain, especially to wholesalers, Wilson said. However, the slowing inventory velocity caused in part by the decline in consumer activity from May onward caught everyone—including the retailers—flat-footed, she said. "Inventory is not moving, period," she said in an interview several days before the report's release. Retail stocks must be drawn down considerably for the economy to fully recover, Wilson said.
• Warehousing costs increased by 7.6 percent as rising inventories fully absorbed warehouse capacity, which had already been pared back during and immediately after the recession. As a result, leasing rates also rose, the report said. New construction took up some of the slack but rising occupancy rates offset the capacity increases, the report said.
• Trucking costs—essentially defined as rates paid by modal users—increased by 2.9 percent. Intercity trucking costs rose 3.1 percent, while "local delivery," or non-intercity, costs climbed 2.1 percent. Truck tonnage increased 2.3 percent over 2011 levels. Truckers have been satisfied with their tonnage activity through the first half of 2013, Wilson said. However, they have been disappointed in their inability to raise prices to levels needed to neutralize a host of rising costs from labor to equipment and still make a decent return, she said.
The report predicted that the shortage of qualified drivers, now believed to stand at about 30,000, could swell to nearly four times that by 2016. That increase will be caused by various government regulations that will take drivers off the road as well as industry struggles to hire and retain younger drivers to replace those who retire, quit, or die. Only about 17 percent of the current driver population is under 35, according to the report.
• Rail transport costs paid by users rose 4.9 percent, down from an increase of more than 16 percent in 2011. The large drop came despite the second best year on record for intermodal volume and a leveling-off in a severe multiyear decline in coal traffic, which accounted for more than 40 percent of rail tonnage. Wilson said rail equipment and infrastructure is ample and in excellent shape, a result of the industry pouring a record $13 billion last year into capital spending, a 16.1-percent increase over 2011 levels.
Wilson blamed the sharp decline in rail shipping costs on fall-offs in tonnage for coal, grain, and chemicals, which accounted for 62 percent of total tonnage hauled. Intermodal, despite reporting year-over-year gains, came under severe rate pressure from truck competition, especially as railroads began expanding into shorter-haul lanes that traditionally have been the province of motor carriers. Three commodities reporting tonnage gains—petroleum products; motor vehicles and equipment; and crushed stone, sand, and gravel—comprised only 15 percent of rail tonnage last year, according to the report.
• The ocean and international air sectors had a tough time of it last year with slack global economies and a glut of capacity combining to curb demand and pricing. For example, ocean costs fell by 0.9 percent last year as vessel capacity rose 7.2 percent. Capacity is expected to rise by 10 percent in 2013 as new vessel deliveries exceed demand to fill it, Wilson said.
The annual "State of Logistics Report" is produced by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) and sponsored by Penske Logistics.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.