In Europe, Baxter International's experience with "horizontal collaboration," where two or more shippers share transportation movements, has been so successful that the company plans to expand the program beyond its current boundaries.
In Europe, it's estimated that nearly one-fourth of the trucks running along the continent's congested roads are empty. These empty trailers— which are typically on their way back from deliveries or en route to pick up goods—are exacerbating the area's traffic and air-quality problems while also wasting money. If companies would work together on moving goods, then those empty miles could be reduced, thereby easing congestion and curtailing air pollution, including greenhouse gas emissions.
That's why the European Union (EU) has begun encouraging what it calls "horizontal collaboration." Horizontal collaboration involves multiple, independent shippers working together in communities to consolidate compatible freight flows. These bundled freight flows are then outsourced to and physically executed by a logistics service provider.
One early mover in this initiative is Baxter International Inc. Since 2011, the health-care products company has been collaborating with other businesses to share transportation movements across Europe. After three years of participating in horizontal collaboration, the company has seen some significant advantages and demonstrated the viability of the concept, says Ludovic Menedeme, Baxter's director for transport and distribution services.
Early mover in collaboration
Headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois, USA, Baxter is a global business with expertise in medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology. In 2012 the company reported about US $14 billion in worldwide revenue, with approximately 29 percent of its sales in Europe. Baxter manufactures in 27 countries and sells its products in more than 100 countries.
The company took part in its first European transportation collaboration in 2011. It teamed up with the Belgium-based pharmaceutical manufacturing company UCB to share shipping to six Eastern European countries: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Romania.
Baxter and UCB were brought together in 2010 by Tri-Vizor NV, a neutral third party that orchestrates shipper collaborations. The Belgian service provider's database showed that the two companies had significant overlap between their freight flows out of Belgium and could benefit from shared transportation. "Eastern Europe was chosen because the destination points of UCB and Baxter were close to each other in the vicinity of the capital cities, and because the distance [to the final locations] from the Baxter and UCB distribution centers in Belgium was quite large," explains Sven Verstrepen, business development director for Tri-Vizor. "The larger the distance, the bigger the savings opportunities of flow bundling."
Baxter and UCB now use a motor carrier to make full truckload shipments to all of the Eastern European destinations except for Romania, where co-loaded containers move via railroad. For the over-the-road shipments, the truck stops first at a UCB plant in Belgium and then proceeds to Baxter's facility in nearby Lessines. The truck goes to UCB first due to the first-in, last-out loading sequence for pallets: At each destination in Eastern Europe, the truck delivers to Baxter's customer first and then to UCB's consignee.
That synchronization also extends to how much product each company ships. Normally, Menedeme says, UCB places three pallets on the truck. If the Belgian pharmaceutical maker wants more than three pallets, Baxter will ship fewer of its own pallets on that truck.
In 2012, Tri-Vizor suggested Baxter collaborate with another shipper, Donaldson Company Inc., a maker of filtration systems. Now Baxter and Donaldson co-load shipments from Belgium to Ireland. A truck picks up raw materials from Baxter's and Donaldson's facilities in Belgium and then takes a short-sea ferry from the port of Zeebrugge, Belgium, to Dublin, Ireland. From there the truck travels to Castlebar, Ireland, where a Donaldson manufacturing center is located near a Baxter plant.
The importance of a neutral trustee
In both of the cases just described, Tri-Vizor, acting as a neutral trustee, helped to set up the agreement between the shipping partners. As an impartial third party, Tri-Vizor can make sure that all costs and savings from the collaboration are distributed equitably. It also can synchronize the two shippers' daily operations so that one is not favored over the other.
Tri-Vizor coordinates the shipments through its Web portal. Baxter and its shipping partners place shipment orders through the Tri-Vizor portal, which automatically synchronizes the shipments and assigns them to a carrier on a pre-approved list. The portal also handles all aspects of the collaborative arrangement, including invoicing, Menedeme says. As part of that process, Tri-Vizor tracks such key performance indicators as number of loads consolidated, pickup and delivery performance, and claims, as well as monetary and greenhouse gas savings.
There are limits on what any party can see through the portal, as Tri-Vizor makes sure to guard companies' confidential data. "Community members can review performance indicators for the community and for their own business, but not for another company," Verstrepen explains.
Since it began those collaboration projects three years ago, Menedeme says, Baxter has realized freightcost savings of around 10 percent on the collaborative trade lanes. In addition, the company has witnessed a 30-percent reduction in its transportation-related carbon dioxide (CO2) footprint as a result of the consolidated truck shipments and the use of short-sea shipping and rail. "The additional benefits are that we achieved a higher service level because of the more frequent combined departures as well as saving on CO2," Menedeme explains. "If you don't put halfempty trucks on the road, you ease congestion."
From CO2 to CO3
Baxter has now begun working with the European consortium Collaboration Concepts for Co-modality, informally known as CO3. Tri-Vizor is a key member of that consortium, which was launched with a grant of 2 million euros from the European Commission. The organization's goal is to promote shared supply chains as a way for Europe to reduce its dependence on foreign oil, ease traffic congestion, and cut greenhouse gases. Comprising 17 members, CO3 is developing a legal framework that allows companies to work together without violating antitrust law. It's also conducting pilots to demonstrate the value of shared supply chains from both a monetary and a sustainability standpoint.
At the moment, Baxter is engaged with two other test projects under the auspices of CO3. One of those involves the consumer goods company Kimberly-Clark, which got under way in March 2013. Kimberly-Clark and Baxter now send full truckloads back and forth between France and Belgium. The project is being managed by Tri-Vizor and another CO3 consortium member, Giventis, a Dutch information services company. Giventis developed a platform that automatically detects co-loading and round-trip opportunities beween multiple logistics networks. In another project, Baxter is working with three other companies— Belgian retailer Colruty, the building-products company Eternit, and Ontex, a manufacturer of hygienic personal care products—to run full truckloads between Belgium and Spain. That project is making use whenever possible of short-sea shipping between those two countries.
The key to successful horizontal collaboration, Menedeme says, is having compatible organizations that can work together in an operational alignment. "To make this work," he says, "you need a good fit between the parties and buy-in by senior management, because horizontal collaboration becomes rapidly a key element in your supply chain strategy."
Future expansion
Based on its previous successes, Baxter has even more plans for collaboration in the future. Menedeme says his company is now working with the consumer goods giant Procter & Gamble to explore the possibility of creating enough shipment volume to run dedicated cargo trains within Europe.
Baxter isn't limiting itself when it comes to identifying additional opportunities for horizontal collaboration. "We're looking to expand this geographically and work with many more companies," Menedeme says. "We want to use transport modes such as ocean and air. This will be not only for Europe but on a global scale."
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.