The rail carload and intermodal segments are facing two different outlooks for 2023. Carload is performing better than expected, while intermodal is struggling to compete with trucking.
The rail industry is currently seeing two separate story lines develop as the intermodal and carload segments follow different paths. One is growing in line with the underlying economy, while the other is declining significantly on strong modal competition.
Intermodal was once thought of as the growth driver of rail volumes, and while it could return to those heights in the future, it has a steep hill to climb. The last 18 months have been ones of disappointment and uncertainty for intermodal. Both international and domestic freight volumes struggled to find their footing after a post-pandemic surge of traffic created congestion all along the supply chain. In recent quarters, intermodal has been buffeted by the tremendous uncertainty created by the lack of a labor contract for dockworkers at West Coast ports and the economic reality of lower-than-average active truck utilization.
While the International Longshore and Warehouse Union and Pacific Maritime Association tentatively agreed in June to terms for a new six-year agreement, it is less clear whether traffic will immediately start to flow back to the West Coast ports. Overall intermodal volume is expected to decline by 8% from 2022’s weak levels, before returning to modest growth in 2024.
Over the last few years, West Coast ports have lost market share to their East and Gulf Coast peers because of a combination of congestion and uncertainty over the now-resolved labor situation. The labor situation dragged on for nearly a year beyond when the West Coast port labor contract expired in July 2022, meaning many shippers diverted cargo for well over a year. In that time, they developed new relationships with drayage providers, ports, and warehousers that they may be unwilling to sever only to return to the West Coast and lose some alternative routes.
The move to East and Gulf Coast ports has eroded one of intermodal’s key advantages over trucking: length of haul. A 250-mile to 550-mile length of haul makes trucking much more competitive compared to rail intermodal than the 2,000-plus mile lengths of haul that are routine for imports from the U.S. West Coast into the interior.
At the same time, active truck utilization declined dramatically over the last few quarters and is below its long-run historical average, making truckers hungry for any and all available freight. As a result, intermodal has had to work to sell its value proposition at a time when rail service was also experiencing struggles. Lower truck rates, combined with the perceived better service reliability of trucking, has made for challenging competitive dynamics for rail intermodal as can be seen in FTR’s Intermodal Competitive Index shown in Figure 1.
That tough competitive environment is expected to remain in place until the second half of 2024, when it will ease back toward a more neutral footing over the course of the year. Until that happens, expect intermodal volumes to remain at or below five-year average levels.
Intermodal wildcard
Carriers have tried to adapt to the changing port dynamics and competitive truck market by introducing new and expanded services for intermodal containers leaving the Port of Houston, Texas. Gulf Coast ports have experienced tremendous growth in the post-pandemic period as shippers work to serve the growing Texas market. The new intermodal services, most of which started on June 1, are railroads’ attempt to capture some of this additional volume.
The wildcard when it comes to intermodal volumes is if and how flows change in response to the railway merger of Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern (CPKC) that took effect earlier this year. Mexico is expected to post its second consecutive year of double-digit percentage intermodal volume growth in 2023 before downshifting to low single-digit results. That expected downshift could be altered by the new service offerings and partnerships announced in the wake of the CPKC transaction. Not only has CPKC added several new partners and beefed up its cross-border offerings, but other railroads responded by creating their own expedited intermodal services from Mexico into the upper Midwest.
These services could cause Mexican intermodal to outperform the 2% year-over-year growth expected and help it break its traditional status as an intra-Mexico (rather than cross-border) move. It is too early to adjust the base expectation higher or to know what the magnitude of the impact will be from the new services coming out of Mexico.
Better than expected
In a marked contrast with intermodal, carload volumes are performing better than expected through the first half of 2023 and are expected to grow for the full year. Carload volumes are expected to increase by 2% this year, in line with or slightly faster than overall gross domestic product (GDP) growth.
Coal, the largest carload sector by volume, has held up better than expected through the first half of the year, despite low natural gas pricing that should be denting domestic demand. It is expected that coal volumes will weaken as the year moves along, but its first half steadiness is already enough to likely ensure it avoids a negative outcome for the full year.
Chemicals volume started 2023 essentially in line with the prior year and five-year average levels, but it has shown some weakness as the end of the second quarter nears. This is worrisome not just for carload volume levels but also for what it could mean for the overall economy, as the base chemicals produced in this sector feed a number of manufacturing and industrial processes across the economy. New chemical facilities set to come online in 2024 and 2025 should boost volumes over the longer term, but the next few quarters could be a challenge.
Crushed stone, sand, and gravel traffic remains a bright spot for loadings as it has for the last six quarters. Federal and state infrastructure dollars should keep that sector moving forward for quarters to come as additional money is disbursed.
Metals and automotive are two more sectors that appear to have a solid foundation for carload growth over the next few quarters, as automotive production remains strong to rebuild inventory and meet demand.
Forest products traffic, however, is likely to be challenged in the next few quarters as lumber copes with the machinations of the housing market and pulp and paper appears to be settling into a pattern of lower volumes for a longer period of time.
Key factor: service
In general, slow-and-steady growth is expected to rule the day moving into 2024 for carload traffic, while intermodal faces headwinds for the next year. While those competitive pressures for intermodal will abate slowly over the next year, it will be 2024 before volumes truly turn around. Indeed, the competitive situation is not expected to place intermodal on level footing with its truckload competition until late next year.
In the long run, the primary factor determining rail companies’ success—whether intermodal or carload—will ultimately be whether carriers can deliver on the service expectations of their customers.
Service levels remain an area of dispute between carriers and shippers. While progress was made early in the year for both overall velocity for intermodal shipments and dwell time, these two metrics slipped back toward historical averages at the beginning of the second quarter and held there for most of the period.
Meanwhile railcars online, which measures the total number of railcars actively hauling freight in the North American rail system, remained stubbornly high until the end of the second quarter. Typically having a high level of railcars online is good, but only if they are supporting freight growth. Over the last few years, however, shippers have been adding and keeping railcars in the fleet to compensate for poor rail service (and not growth). So in this case, as service improves and freight growth is slow, railcars should be coming out of the fleet. We did begin to see this trend in the waning weeks of the second quarter, as railcars online came to a level that is in line with its historical average and closer to the levels other metrics had been holding.
The ultimate test of the health of the rail sector going forward will be whether carriers can improve service levels, as they will have a large impact on rail’s ability to reclaim and maintain market share from trucking in the intermodal and carload realms.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.