Dr. Zac Rogers is an associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University's College of Business. He is a co-author of the monthly Logistics Managers’ Index.
From 2020 to 2022, the inventory situation in the U.S. could be described as like a roller coaster. Lockdowns led to too many goods through the first half of 2020, stimulus-fueled consumer spending led to too few through 2021, and then inventories hit record highs in early 2022 as inflation went through the roof. Inventories then steadily declined through late 2022 and the first half of 2023. Inventories are now showing signs of stabilizing and it appears that the roller coaster ride is ending as we finally move back to “normal.”
The easing of the inventory burden is illustrated by the Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI). The LMI is a change index in which any value over 50.0 indicates expansion, with higher values indicating greater rates of expansion. Anything under 50.0 indicates contraction, with lower values indicating grater rates of contraction. The July 2023 Inventory Levels Index reads in at 41.9, indicating the fastest rate of decline since the index began in 2016; and when combined with the May and June 2023 readings, marking the first-ever instance of multiple consecutive months of contraction. The contraction we see this summer is a far cry from the reading of 71.8 we saw in June 2022.
Despite the all-time lows hit this summer, there is some evidence that the long and painful drop that has been going on since early 2022 is beginning to subside. Retailers like Target and Walmart are back in “good shape,” with inventories “right sized” for the near future. The Institute for Supply Management’s June survey of manufacturers reported that inventories are down and even approaching a level that some manufacturers would consider to be “too low.”1
So, do these low inventory numbers portend the recession that many have been forecasting for the last year? No. In fact, in a somewhat counterintuitive fashion, low inventories may be just what the economy needs to get back on track. The reason why can be understood if we analyze Figure 1, which displays LMI data for inventory levels, inventory costs, warehousing prices, and transportation prices. Inventory levels peaked at an all-time high of 80.2 in February of 2022. This put significant stress on supply chain capacity and drove costs through the roof.
When all three of the cost metrics in Figure 1 are combined, it provides an aggregate supply chain cost ranging from 0–300 with a breakeven level of 150. Aggregate costs reached their highest ever level of 271.4 in March 2022. Interestingly, the San Francisco Federal Reserve’s estimate of inflation coming from supply issues peaked at the same time.2 The heavy inventory burden was driving the costs of supply chains up and contributing heavily to inflation. If we fast forward to July 2023, we can see that inventories are contracting, and all three of the cost metrics are down significantly from where they were a year ago.
[FIGURE 1] Inventories and supply chain costs 2020-2023 Enlarge this image
Aggregate supply costs read in at an all-time low of 153.2 in June of 2023 and then at 156.7 in July, both of which are close to essentially no growth. Relatedly, the Federal Reserve estimated that supply pressures were actively lowering inflation during the spring of 2023. Evidence of this can be seen in the Consumer Price Index dipping to 3% (significantly lower than the 9.1% seen in June 2022) and more sophisticated inflation measures—such as “supercore” measures (which excludes goods with volatile prices like food, energy, used cars, and shelter) and the Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices—returning to normal levels. When taken together this suggests that high inventories strained supply chains and were a large factor behind inflation. Now that inventories have been reduced, supply pressure is contracting, and inflation is slowing. Essentially, as inventories are reaching a healthy level, the overall economy is getting healthier as well.
It should also be pointed out that inventories are not actually abnormally low, they are just lower than they were during the crisis and recovery of the last few years. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau tracking the seasonally adjusted inventory-to-sales ratio for total business inventories for 2015–2023 show signs of a return to normal. (See Figure 2.) Inventory-to-sales ratios are helpful in the context of 2022–2023 because inflation impacts each side of the ratio. As inventories become more expensive, sales prices increase along with them. The average inventory-to-sales ratio from 2015–2019 is represented by the dashed red line. When firms had more inventory than they could sell, as in the spring of 2020, the inventory-to-sales ratio increased. Conversely, the ratio decreased in the summer of 2021 when inventory was being sold very quickly and firms were having a difficult time keeping up with demand. From 2015 to 2019, the inventory-to-sales ratio for businesses in the U.S. averaged 1.40. Through the first four months of 2023 (the most recent data available), the ratio has returned to levels consistent with that pre-COVID average.
[FIGURE 2] 2015-2023 Total business inventories to sales ration - seasonally adjusted Enlarge this image
Impact on supply chain capacity and costs
The return to normal will have several important impacts on supply chains. Many carriers built up capacity with an eye toward being able to handle the high levels of inventory moving through the system from 2020–2022. The excess freight capacity has clearly hurt some fleets, but it has also lowered prices for retailers, manufacturers, and consumers. Once again carriers find themselves in a situation similar to 2018–19 when we had a freight recession, but no recession in the overall economy. Eventually, however, supply and demand will rebalance, and prices should stabilize at lower levels than were seen from 2020–2022. The recent bankruptcy at Yellow that has eliminated the third-largest less-than-truckload carrier in the U.S. is evidence of the move back towards equilibrium in the freight industry.
Warehousing firms also built up capacity with 738.6 million square feet of new warehousing space coming online in 2020 and 2021. However, due to the slower rate at which warehousing can expand, we are not seeing a similar recession in this market. Despite the slowdown in the market, many firms are betting on future growth due to the continued long-term expansion of e-commerce. While its growth has slowed, e-commerce has remained elevated, which means that the service levels provided by more warehousing will be important going forward. The increase in the number of warehouse locations suggests that inventories will stay slightly higher than they were pre-pandemic.
We should, however, expect inventories to stay below their 2021–2022 highs for the foreseeable future. The move back towards normalcy is allowing some retailers to move back toward the just-in-time (JIT) inventory management systems used before the pandemic. One major difference now is that firms have worked hard over the last few years to shorten supply chains as well as diversify the supply base to become hardier in the face of disruptions. The waves of reshoring and nearshoring (in some industries) will allow supply chains to be more reactive to consumer demand and hopefully avoid some of the traps they fell into during 2021. Essentially, supply chains are attempting to balance the low-cost JIT systems they had before the pandemic with the more resilient portfolio approaches that allowed them to keep goods in stock during the pandemic. For many firms this seems to be taking the form of sourcing JIT inventories from multiple firms, in multiple regions, utilizing multiple ports and forms of transit. Pursuing a hybrid JIT/portfolio strategy should help firms to avoid the wild swings in inventory we saw over the last few years.
Future outlook
When asked to predict logistics activity over the next 12 months, LMI respondents predicted that inventory levels will begin to expand again, moving from contraction to a moderate expansionary rate of 53.7. This is a marked shift from what we saw through most of the spring when respondents were expecting contraction. An expansion rate of 53.7 suggests that firms will generally be replacing goods as they are sold, with overall inventories increasing at a slower, potentially more sustainable rate of growth. This optimism is at least partially due to lower inflation and increased consumer confidence. Things can always change, but at the moment it seems that the potential recession that scared many firms away from replenishing inventories has not come, and supply chains are looking to get back to business as usual.
Author’s note:For more insights like those presented above, see the LMI reports posted the first Tuesday of every month at: www.the-lmi.com.
Notes:
1. “June 2023 Manufacturing ISM Report on Business,” Institute for Supply Management (July 1, 2023): https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-news-and-reports/reports/ism-report-on-business/pmi/june/
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.