The highs and lows of e-commerce shopping and fulfillment in the United States were on full display during the 2013 holiday season. Consumers hoping to avoid the congestion and chaos in brick-and-mortar stores increased their online purchases to US $69.2 billion for the fourth quarter of 2013, up 15.7 percent compared with the same period in 2012, according to U.S. Bureau of the Census figures. That growth in online sales, together with a surge in last-minute orders and an unusually short shopping season, made it difficult for U.S. shippers and the top two parcel carriers, UPS and FedEx, to fulfill e-commerce orders. Consumer outrage over late shipments forced a number of retailers, including Amazon and Kohl's, to respond by offering refunds and other financial concessions to affected customers.
While the events of the 2013 holiday season are now history, the challenges facing retailers and shippers are not over. In the high-growth, constantly changing e-commerce environment, every touch-point—from shopping, to purchasing, to fulfillment—presents an opportunity to either create a truly customer-centric experience or to cause customer dissatisfaction.
Keeping up with the consumer
To succeed in e-commerce fulfillment, retailers must find ways to meet consumers' increasingly high expectations. Online buyers desire a retail experience that combines the simplicity and security of online shopping with the ease and familiarity of in-store interaction. They expect their orders to be delivered within one to two days, and they want free or discounted shipping.
Consumers also demand a flexible store policy that allows for various combinations of purchases and returns, in-store or from home. Increasingly, they expect a unified and personalized shopping experience provided through a retailer's online/mobile app or by a knowledgeable in-store associate.
Developing the capabilities that are necessary to execute a desirable e-commerce strategy will require retailers to reassess and optimize their current services and operations. This will be challenging in an environment where changing consumer preferences continually alter business models. And it will only get harder as omnichannel expectations continue to rise and retailers are pushed to offer additional products and services, both online and in-store.
Innovation despite constraints
Retailers are continuing to innovate in response to market demand, but they're doing so within the bounds of several constraints. The biggest, perhaps, involves shipping capacity. The problems with shipping reliability in 2013, for instance, caused many to wonder whether capacity issues will persist as e-commerce continues to grow. It seems likely that the large retailers will continue to stretch parcel carriers' capacity during peak periods, forcing other retailers to develop alternative strategies. Additionally, recently announced plans by FedEx and UPS to institute volumetric pricing for all ground parcel shipments have major implications for retailers. Volumetric pricing is a response to the increase in e-commerce shipments—the lower ratios of package weight to package dimensions mean less cargo is carried in the same amount of space. Carriers hope that in response to their new rate policies, shippers will optimize their packaging and shipping practices by paying more attention to efficiency and weight.
Meanwhile, Amazon, the largest e-commerce entity in the United States, is rapidly and boldly developing a host of new services that are designed to improve its customers' experiences and give the company greater ownership of its supply chain. To limit its dependence on carriers, for instance, Amazon is developing an in-house fulfillment service that includes a private fleet that will handle some of its same-day and expedited shipments. In addition, it is piloting warehousing and logistics partnerships with manufacturers to reduce the cost and time required to get products to its customers. Amazon is also looking to utilize regional carriers in some areas and the U.S. Postal Service for less populated markets and Sunday deliveries. All of these moves circumvent much of the national footprints of UPS and FedEx.
While Amazon may have price and distribution advantages in online commerce, traditional brick-and-mortar retailers are seeking a competitive edge by developing capabilities that leverage their storefronts and online presence to create truly omnichannel experiences. In the white paper Are You Ready? How to Create an Always-On, Always-Open Shopping Experience, Capgemini Consulting identified four key capabilities that retailers must possess if they are to effectively compete in this increasingly important area:
Inventory visibility—systems and processes to accurately track and manage inventory in their networks
Web-ready products—improved information about products and services sold online, and reduced time and labor required for retailers to bring items to market
Predictive customer analytics—information utilized to anticipate customers' needs based on past behaviors, in an effort to enhance the continuity of the omnichannel experience
Fulfillment strategy—revision of processes, modernization of technologies, and updating of physical infrastructure to support the omnichannel experience
Retailers that are investing in their supply chains to support these four capabilities are making it possible to provide omnichannel experiences for their customers. With these capabilities in place, they are achieving increased sales through alternate channels, improvements in productivity and inventory accuracy, reduced shrinkage, and faster fulfillment of customer demand.
The new e-commerce landscape
A new e-commerce landscape is emerging as a result of the trends and developments mentioned above. Within this environment, retailers, online leaders, shipping leaders, regional carriers, and the U.S. Postal Service can all succeed by occupying different niches (summarized in Figure 1).
First, retailers should focus on developing omnichannel capabilities as a means of competing against Amazon, which has advantages in price, fulfillment capability, and speed. Meanwhile, online leaders, such as Amazon and Wal-Mart, will continue to leverage their size to invest in capabilities that allow them to lead the market on price and speed. On the shipping side, leaders such as FedEx and UPS should continue to invest in infrastructure and e-commerce-specific capabilities. If, however, Amazon develops transportation and delivery capability for itself, it will likely look to offer that as a service and could become a major competitor to the parcel carriers. Regional carriers and logistics service providers should consider partnerships with larger retailers and online leaders, build capabilities in niche markets, and examine methods for shipping products with specialized shipping needs (such as beverages, for example). And finally, the U.S. Postal Service should try to capitalize on its "last mile" scale and capability, positioning itself as an asset that can support other carriers and retailers that want to increase their delivery reach.
Companies seeking to navigate this emerging e-commerce landscape would be wise to determine whether or not their existing facilities can support the increasing consumer demand for omnichannel fulfillment. They should also understand what supplemental warehousing and fulfillment capacity and capabilities will be needed, and how retail models that allow for in-store pickup and return of online orders will need to be supported by warehousing and fulfillment operations. Both retailers and carriers should evaluate increased partnership with 3PL providers and other supply chain specialists to ensure they possess the capabilities required to handle expedited fulfillment and satisfy increasingly complex customer demands. Evaluating these areas will allow retailers and carriers to determine their strategic options, current operational readiness, and whether investment in new infrastructure will be needed to support their e-commerce business.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.