The industrial property sector is partying like it's...well...2005.
The market—which lumps together manufacturing, warehouse and distribution center, transportation, and logistics facilities—is experiencing one of its strongest cycles in years. Warehouse rents are rising, with the average rental rate up 4.4 percent from a year ago, according to JLL, a real estate and logistics company. CBRE Inc., a huge developer, pegs the year-on-year gain at about 3.1 percent. In the southern California market, home to the country's largest seaport complex, rents are up nearly three times that, driven by huge demand for port-centric property as well as the need for more cross-dock space to handle the transloading of goods from 20- or 40-foot marine containers to 53-foot boxes moved inland via truck or rail intermodal.
Vacancy rates nationwide in the third quarter dropped to 7.2 percent, the lowest level in six years, according to JLL data. Vacancies in red-hot markets like the Lehigh Valley in central Pennsylvania have dipped below that, hitting levels not seen for a decade or more, according to Jake Terkanian, vice president of the global industrial services group at CBRE. Nationwide availability, which tracks current vacancies and space that will become available in the next six months, reached their lowest levels in the quarter since the first quarter of 2008, according to CBRE.
Nationwide net absorption, broadly defined as the amount of occupied space less the amount of space vacated, hit 143.8 million square feet through the first nine months, up 28.5 percent from a year ago, JLL said. Vacancy rates could fall to as low as 6.9 percent in the seasonally strong fourth quarter, when demand for space picks up before the holidays, JLL said. By year's end, net absorption will reach, at minimum, 185 million square feet, up nearly 10 percent from a year ago, JLL said.
The anecdotes add fuel to the story. In the Lehigh Valley, there are no more 500,000-square-foot "big box" distribution centers on the market, according to Terkanian, who oversees the region for CBRE. In Bethlehem, Pa., Zulily, a fast-growing e-tailer, leased out all the space of an 800,000-square-foot distribution center, which was built as a speculative development, about six months before construction was finished. Out west, Los Angeles has a 1.9-percent industrial vacancy rate, according to Newmark Grubb Knight Frank, a real estate services firm. About 2.5 million square feet is under construction there.
California's "Inland Empire," where industrial rents are significantly cheaper than in and around the Los Angeles basin, has been on a multiyear roll as the DC conduit between imports off-loaded at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach and consumer markets across the west. Ironically, third-quarter vacancy rates have ticked up to 5 percent from 4.8 percent in the prior quarter and 4.6 percent in the year ago period, according to Newmark data. That could be because of a minor oversupply condition due to the 12 million square feet under construction there.
Low interest rates, sharply declining oil prices, and a generally better economy have created a "potent cocktail" for industrial demand, according to Jim Clewlow, chief investment officer of Centerpoint Properties, which specializes in developing transportation and logistics projects. Should oil prices stabilize at current levels or fall further, that could trigger demand for more distribution centers, Clewlow said. That's because higher oil prices generally encourage producers, distributors, and retailers to consolidate their DC networks in an effort to reduce shipping costs and conserve fuel.
The industrial segment is demand-driven, and tenant demand is demonstrating consistent strength. Space needs were up by 23.9 million square feet compared to the winter of 2013, and on par with summer 2014 levels, JLL said. In addition, 45 percent of the demand is for space under 500,000 square feet, a reflection of broad-based strength and the bullishness of smaller distributors, the firm said.
A VIRTUOUS CYCLE
When the real estate market turned down sharply starting in 2007, industrial construction nationwide virtually ceased. It stayed frozen for about 18 months. From 2010 to 2013, deliveries of new projects plumbed a 50-year low, according to JLL data.
However, as e-commerce growth and low interest rates began fueling economic activity, developers got busy and once-dormant markets started perking up. They've continued to gain momentum. Total construction in the third quarter of 2014 rose 16.5 percent from the prior quarter and 54.2 percent from a year ago, according to JLL. In Atlanta, construction reached 12.4 million square feet by quarter's end, up 104 percent from the end of the prior quarter, the firm said.
Still, there is plenty of catching up to do. New completions at the end of 2014 will only match 2003 levels, says Dain Fedora, JLL's research manager, Americas industrial. Projected new completions hitting the market next year will only return the sector to 2005 levels, he adds. The supply that went online in the third quarter, while being the strongest quarter to date, is still at levels below the long-term average, adds CBRE.
The market, being what it is, will eventually seek its level. Supply will continue to increase, eventually bringing it into equilibrium with demand. But that may not happen until well into 2016. "We still need that product," Terkanian says. Landlords, meanwhile—who three or four years ago were handing out incentives left and right to entice prospective tenants and keep existing ones—are now in the catbird's seat. "In 24 months, the pendulum has completely swung," Terkanian says.
Bigger markets like Los Angeles, Dallas, Chicago, and New Jersey/central Pennsylvania may find themselves with a supply overhang, according to Tim Feemster, managing principal of Foremost Quality Logistics, a consulting company. However, tenant demand should remain sufficiently strong to keep net absorption levels growing, Feemster adds.
Activity in 2015 will be influenced by how the holiday season pans out, Feemster says. Busy cash registers combined with a continued uptick in the overall economy will embolden developers to increase their capital investments, he reckons.
In this environment, it is hardly a surprise to see rental rates increase. And that is unlikely to faze producers, distributors, and retailers willing to pay a premium to be near transportation nodes and dense population centers. According to JLL, logistics costs—transportation, inventory, and labor—account for about 80 percent of a user's operating budget. Real estate, by contrast, comprises just about 5 percent. Higher rents are "a drop in the bucket" for companies keen on being where their customers are, Fedora says.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.