For more than three decades, Joseph Estrella held logistics and transportation positions at major companies. Now he's using that experience to help prepare students for careers in supply chain management.
For the past four years, Joseph Estrella has worked full time as a lecturer at the University of Rhode Island (URI), where he teaches operations, global supply chain management, international transportation, and other courses to both undergraduate and graduate students.
He brings to those classes more than 35 years of experience as a logistics and transportation professional for both motor carriers and shippers, including management positions at three large companies: the motor carrier Roadway Express, the office supply retailer Staples, and CVS, the retailer and provider of health-care and pharmacy services. Before joining URI full time, he taught there part time while serving as director of the transportation and logistics network for CVS.
Estrella recently spoke with Editorial Director Peter Bradley about his career and why he believes it's important to expose students of supply chain management to real-world experience.
Name: Joseph M. Estrella Jr. Title: Lecturer in operations, supply chain management, transportation, and logistics/transportation law Organization: College of Business Administration, University of Rhode Island Education: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, with a concentration in industrial relations, from University of Massachusetts—Dartmouth; Juris Doctor from New England School of Law Business Experience: Operations management, sales, and labor relations positions with Roadway Express Inc.; director of operations, Plymouth Rock Transportation Inc.; director of transportation, Staples Inc.; vice president national transport services, United Road Services Inc.; director of transportation and logistics network, CVS Inc. CSCMP Member:13 years
Tell me about your experience in private industry and how it influenced you.
I have had a terrific career. I worked for what were arguably the three best companies in their respective industries at the time. I worked for Roadway Express for 15 years in roles ranging from dock supervisor and sales representative to posts in operations management and terminal management. For my last six years there, I was the labor relations manager for New England. Roadway was a great place to learn about transportation and logistics, but more importantly, I think, Roadway had a terrific way of teaching you how to deal with people. During my time there I certainly learned about honesty, integrity, and ethics.
The next stop in my career was working at Staples, which was a rather young company at the time. I am very proud to say that I was a big part of setting up the distribution process for the catalog division, which at the time was called Staples Direct. That part of the business grew very quickly. In fact, in two years, we went from US $28 million in sales to $310 million. I learned a lot about the retail industry working at Staples. I then moved to CVS and worked there for a long time. When I joined CVS, the company had no stores west of the Mississippi, and now, through tremendous acquisition and growth, it is a national and international company.
I was fortunate. I got to work in three really good areas with three really good companies, which serves me well now that I am at the University of Rhode Island.
What made you take the leap from supply chain professional to educator?
While I was at CVS, we were contacted by URI to work on a distribution project. That was my first interaction with the university. URI then asked me to serve on its Supply Chain Advisory Committee, which is made up of URI faculty and business people in the community. Later, the university asked me to be an adjunct professor, so I started teaching one course a semester, which I really enjoyed. About four years ago, URI asked if I wanted to teach full time. I think the timing was right for me to retire from private industry and become a part of URI's faculty.
URI's supply chain management (SCM) program started around 2007, and we have already been recognized as having one of the top 25 supply chain programs in the country. The SCM major is actually the fastest-growing major within the college of business.
How does your experience in private industry influence what you teach and how you teach?
At URI, we teach all the different theories and formulas that SCM students need to know and understand, but the fact of the matter is, in the real world of business, it still boils down to people executing their jobs properly. I try to relate real-life experiences to the students with real-world examples. A perfect example is economic order quantity (EOQ). For EOQ to work properly, you want to minimize your holding and ordering costs. You teach students the EOQ formula, you give them a few problems, and they now understand how to determine EOQ. But then I ask them a simple question: If you're working for a large corporation, you may have 40,000 or 50,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs). Do you really think you're going to sit down and go through this formula for 40,000 SKUs every single week? No, you just don't have the time to do it, and that's where software comes into play. That kind of example resonates with students. The idea is that students have to understand the concept, but how you actually use that concept is sometimes vastly different from what is taught.
How do you get students interested in logistics and supply chain management? I don't imagine most kids come out of high school saying "I want to be a logistician."
Supply chain is not something that's at the top of anyone's list just yet, certainly not when students come out of high school. What we try to do, and we have been pretty successful at it, is explain to students that supply chain is the only discipline that interacts with every other discipline in a corporation. I tell students that when you get into supply chain, you're going to be dealing with procurement, inventory, marketing, advertising, legal, real estate, finance, accounting, logistics, transportation, and distribution as well as with other companies. Then, if students take a course or two, it is not unusual for some of them to change their majors to supply chain.
Do you send your students out into the field at any point in their undergraduate career?
Yes. We emphasize internships to all our students. In fact, many of our students will do two or three internships at the undergraduate level, and that serves a couple of purposes. One, it obviously exposes students to private industry, and two—and this happens more often than not—students do such a great job at their internships that they receive job offers from those same companies.
What are the business professionals you talk to looking for in graduates?
They are looking for, first of all, students with some type of SCM certification. This is an area where URI does an outstanding job, as many of our students will graduate with a CTL [Certified in Transportation and Logistics] certificate from the AST&L [American Society of Transportation and Logistics]. In addition, we have a Lean Six Sigma program, through which many of our students will earn a yellow or even a green belt.
Obviously, technology plays a big role in supply chain management. Business professionals want students who are proficient in programs such as Excel, Access, and simulation software. Our students have done extremely well in the workplace in part because of their knowledge as it relates to technology.
As your students go out the door, what is your advice to them about what they're going to face and what they need to do?
We teach the same things I'm sure most universities do as it relates to what students will face when they enter the work force—things like the importance of collaboration, knocking down silos, trade-offs, and so forth. But I also tell students that unfortunately, all of those things don't happen. Many companies will tell you that they collaborate with suppliers, that they are knocking down silos, when in reality, they just don't do it.
I also tell students they need to trust the people they work with. Trust is something that I think is extremely important in business. For instance, if you have suppliers that are cost competitive, that perform well, and that you trust (and that trust you), you now have a terrific business relationship that will benefit all parties. Unfortunately, I think many companies are so cost driven in the short term that they actually spend more dollars in the long run by constantly changing suppliers who don't perform as expected. In addition, by constantly changing suppliers, customer service is impacted in a negative way.
I tell students that if they want to be successful, they really need to understand the business they are in. Listen, really listen; look, really look; and ask some questions.
I also tell them that if they want to be successful, they are going to work more than eight hours a day. Hard work has always served people well. If you do those things and you treat people right, you will be successful.
The one final thing I always tell students is that there is nothing more important than being honest and having integrity.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.