Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Mastering two-way logistics: a blueprint for nearshoring success

As companies establish operations in Mexico, they need to consider who they will work with not only for forward logistics but also for reverse logistics.

SCX24_blog_US_Mexico_boxes_1200x679.jpg

Following the supply disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic, many U.S. companies began looking for alternative supply chain strategies, with nearshoring emerging as a potential solution. The allure is undeniable. By switching their business operations or manufacturing centers to a country closer to the import destination, companies can reduce their lead times, save on transportation costs, and enhance their overall supply chain resilience. Consequently, there’s been a surge in nearshoring operations, with Mexico taking center stage.

However, as more U.S. companies embrace Mexican nearshoring, they must consider not only how to move goods into the U.S. from Mexico but also how to move goods back into Mexico for returns. This is because e-commerce is a two-way street: people buy, sure, but people also return what they buy. In fact, e-commerce retailers typically deal with significantly higher return rates than brick-and-mortar stores.


Fortunately, amid the ongoing boom in nearshoring, Mexican logistics providers are recognizing the need to provide comprehensive services that handle both purchases and returns. 

Reverse logistics in nearshoring

Reverse logistics—sending a product back down the supply chain—has always been a highly expensive and complex process. Products need to be collected from the customer, inspected to assess their condition, and sorted based on whether they should be restocked, repaired, recycled, or disposed of. All of this costs time and money and can easily become a retailer’s biggest expense if they don’t manage the process efficiently.

Regardless of how expensive and unpleasant product returns can be, it’s a process that businesses can’t afford to ignore. Making returns as smooth and hassle-free as possible can go a long way in boosting customer satisfaction, loyalty, and the chance of repeat purchases. This is especially true in e-commerce, in which 67 percent of customers will check an online store’s return policy before purchasing an item.

However, amid all the excitement of the nearshoring boom, reverse logistics has been largely overlooked. Companies that have switched their operations from Asia to Mexico must ensure that they have a robust and efficient reverse logistics system in place. That means finding warehousing and storage space for returned products and setting up processes for the transportation, inspection, and sorting of returned products. This also means ensuring that any returned products are in strict compliance with international shipping regulations and customs procedures. 

Bridging the gap

Any cross-border logistics chain will depend heavily on building relationships with local logistics providers. This is already underway, with many U.S. companies establishing partnerships with their Mexican counterparts to facilitate the forward transfer of products from Mexico to the United States. By acquiring experience in the nuances of Mexican customs, regulations, and infrastructure, these local professionals will have a strong grasp of both what’s necessary and what is possible when setting up a successful supply chain operation.

For U.S. businesses seeking to cultivate these connections, my advice would be to create a short list of potential partners by engaging with local industry associations, participating in trade shows, and leveraging personal networks. Focus on companies that have a strong track record in successfully handling cross-border shipments. Ideal partners should also be familiar with handling the specific goods to be shipped, as certain products may carry specific tariffs or fees that the logistics provider needs to manage effectively.

Concurrently, companies should apply the same due diligence when seeking partnerships with local reverse logistics providers. This is an expanding market segment that includes both established local logistics companies venturing into returns management and specialized startups focusing solely on returns. These companies have significant advantages in reverse logistics due to low labor costs in Mexico, particularly as reverse logistics has historically been a labor-intensive industry.

Moreover, costs continue to fall as more companies embrace new technologies that can minimize bottlenecks, predict demand surges, and reduce reliance on human labor. For example, internet-of-things (IoT) sensors attached to transit vehicles can provide real-time location data, allowing warehouse workers to predict arrival times and coordinate efficient unloading schedules. Additionally, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered predictive analytics can enable providers to optimize routing, predict demand surges, and anticipate potential disruptions. These and numerous other smart technologies can greatly enhance the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the reverse logistics process.

Clearly, American businesses should evaluate Mexican reverse logistics providers by examining how effectively they have incorporated these new technologies into their daily operations. This ensures that the selected providers are not only technologically adept but also aligned with industry advancements. As the landscape of nearshoring continues to evolve, prioritizing technologically progressive partners in both the forward and reverse logistics spheres will become imperative for businesses aiming to stay ahead in the market. 

Foreseeing and mitigating problems

Any two-way cross-border logistics system is bound to encounter occasional disruptions and breakdowns. By recognizing the inevitability of such issues, businesses can implement robust contingency plans to swiftly address challenges and minimize their effect on operations. For instance, establishing clear communication channels with all stakeholders—including forward and reverse logistics partners, customs authorities, and manufacturers—can facilitate real-time information exchange. This transparency can enable quick decision-making in response to unexpected events such as border delays, labor shortages, or unforeseen regulatory changes.

Furthermore, businesses should also consider diversifying their logistics partners in Mexico. Depending on a single source for outbound shipments and another for handling returned goods can be risky. By contrast, distributing responsibilities among multiple forward and reverse logistics partners can mitigate the effects of any disruptions or unforeseen challenges.

Additionally, by analyzing historical data and market trends through predictive modeling, businesses can anticipate challenges, optimize routes, and allocate resources more effectively. This forward-thinking approach not only mitigates the impact of disruptions but also contributes to the overall efficiency of the cross-border logistics system. 

Final thoughts

While the advantages of Mexico as a forward logistics hub are evident, e-commerce companies must not overlook the crucial aspect of reverse logistics. Establishing a robust two-way cross-border logistics system will be essential for success in the evolving landscape of nearshoring. To that end, businesses should seek partnerships with Mexican logistics providers for both forward and reverse logistics, ensuring a comprehensive and efficient supply chain.

Recent

More Stories

digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could have been $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a campaign button that says, "Supply Chain Issues" lays on top of a U.S. flag.

Supply chain professionals should be aware of how the different policies proposed by the U.S. presidential candidates would affect supply chain operations.

Jon Anders Wiken via Adobe Stock

Assessing the U.S. election impact on supply chain policy

For both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the revival of domestic manufacturing is a key campaign theme and centerpiece in their respective proposals for economic growth and national security. Amid the electioneering and campaign pledges, however, the centrality of supply chain policy is being lost in the shuffle. While both candidates want to make the supply chain less dependent on China and to rebuild the American industrial base, their approaches will impact manufacturing, allied sectors, and global supply chains much differently despite the common overlay of protectionist industrial policy.

Both Trump’s “America First” and Harris’ “Opportunity Economy” policies call for moving home parts of supply chains, like those that bring to market critical products like semiconductors, pharmaceutical products, and medical supplies, and strengthening long-term supply chain resilience by discouraging offshoring. Harris’ economic plan, dubbed the “New Way Forward,” aims to close tax loopholes, strengthen labor rights, and provide government support to high-priority sectors, such as semiconductors and green energy technologies. Trump’s economic plan, dubbed “New American Industrialism,” emphasizes tariffs, corporate tax cuts, and easing of regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less
AMRs and a drone operate in a warehouse environment. Overlaid are blue lines and data indicating that they are all connected digitally.

Future warehouse success depends on robot interoperability.

Image created by Yingyaipumi via Adobe Stock.

The Urgent Call for Warehouse Robotics Interoperability

Interest in warehouse robotics remains high, driven by labor pressures and a general desire to further automate distribution processes. Likewise, the number of robot makers also continues to grow. By one count, more than 50 providers exhibited at the big MODEX show in Atlanta in March 2024.

In distribution environments, there is especially strong interest in autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) for collaborative order picking. In this application, the AMR meets pickers at the right inventory location, and the workers then place picks in totes on the robot, which then moves on to another location/picker or off to packing, greatly reducing human travel time.

Keep ReadingShow less