Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Why pandemic has put recovery audit back on the finance agenda

For finance departments around the globe, COVID-19’s altered reality has been a massive wake-up call. 

Uprooting operations exposed issues and inefficiencies that companies had not expected.  From purchase order to goods receipt, invoice receipt and payment, accounts payable teams are now re-evaluating their processes and firming-up their controls. 


Even before coronavirus, accounts payable teams faced a growing volume of invoices that got bigger every year. The scope for overpayments caused by unrecognized rebates, duplicate invoices, and other common mistakes was growing along with it. 

Some erroneous payments can be explained by human error, but often they signal missing controls that could potentially stop mistakes before they happen.

Whatever their cause, the cumulative impact of invoicing errors erodes margin and eventually leads to big losses. That’s why recovery audits are back on the agenda.  

Why recovery audits still matter

A recovery audit recoups funds lost due to overpayments and under-deductions. By conducting a comprehensive review of vendor payments, companies can minimise the steady drip-drip of losses from invoice processing and other disbursement errors. 

A large company can expect to recover millions in lost profits. Audits can also uncover issues in accounts payable processes that allow invoicing errors to repeat, and bring them to the surface.  

When those issues are addressed, sustainable long-term improvements can be put in place – stopping losses before they happen.

And there will be issues. The chaos caused by changing so much so quickly has raised the risk of invoice errors, missed credits, and overpayments – just as companies are trying to maximize cash flow to manage through the disruption.

No excess capacity

In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, businesses shifted quickly from trying to maintain headcount to extensive layoffs as a matter of survival. 

That left many people doing a job that two people would have handled before. The recovery was slow and gradual, meaning what may have been intended as a temporary measure simply became normal. The old positions didn't come back, and finance teams have been trying to keep their heads above water ever since. 

When coronavirus landed, there wasn't any excess capacity left to unleash.  Adapting to the new reality requires a new approach.

It’s vital that recovery auditors can mirror their clients and work remotely without sacrificing speed and effectiveness. Remote access to data and documents has to be part of the audit process, so auditors can validate and document recoveries without having to be physically present in client offices. 

That lightens the load for clients in terms of how they collaborate or make information available to auditors. New technology platforms are being created that enable auditors to automate and expedite the processing of client data, solicit vendor statements, and generally perform accounts payable reviews more efficiently. 

Stop money from going out the door

Every business is making daily decisions about what’s really essential. Recovery Audit has to be on that list. Almost every Fortune 500 company relies on them as standard practice. For businesses that haven’t yet embraced them, time is of the essence. 

Timelines are a vital success factor in recovery audit, as your ability to identify payment errors and credits owed – then successfully claim them back – diminishes over time.

In the case of credits owed, the sooner you can find them, the more likely you are to realize the value by either applying the credit to an open invoice or getting a check back from the supplier. 

When credits age, they tend to get blended back into the vendor’s balance sheet, written off or applied to invalid invoices. For every year, you add to a retrospective audit, the likelihood of successful recoveries drops off dramatically.

The most successful audits happen when new data feeds arrive on a regular basis. That enables the auditor to catch errors quickly and have the best chance to recover the money.

After more than five decades in recovery audit, PRGX knows that change and uncertainty drive increases in invoice processing errors. We saw it during the Y2K furore and after 9/11. We see it today as the impact of COVID-19 rolls on. 

2020 has seen a level of change and uncertainty at a sustained level that most of us have never experienced. It is simply not realistic to think processing and payment errors have not occurred as a result. To stay efficient in uncertain times, it's essential to address that issue as quickly as possible.

Recent

More Stories

digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of five trucks connected by lines and hubs to give the appearance of a network.

An advanced transportation management system can help with route optimization, real-time tracking, multimodal management, and predicting potential supply chain challenges.

Georgii courtesy of Adobe Stock

How an advanced TMS optimizes supply chain performance

A transportation management system (TMS) is a critical tool for all supply chain and logistics practitioners. It provides shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), and fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) with the visibility they need to manage the supply chain and optimize the movement of products and goods. There are various types of transportation management systems, and while using a basic TMS is better than no TMS at all, advanced transportation management systems offer enhanced functionality and can scale with you as your business grows.

Getting the right TMS in place can have considerable benefits, as a TMS helps with planning and executing the movement of goods on a comprehensive level, which aids in reducing the risks of disruptions at every point in the supply chain. Companies that better manage risk will see significant savings. Data from the supply chain risk intelligence company Interos found that of the organizations they surveyed in 2021, the average organization lost $184 million in global supply chain disruptions. Similarly, a McKinsey study found that, within 10 years, the cost of supply chain disruptions adds up to nearly half of a company’s profits.


Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, it would have had a massive economic impact. The Association of American Railroads (AAR), estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could be $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a campaign button that says, "Supply Chain Issues" lays on top of a U.S. flag.

Supply chain professionals should be aware of how the different policies proposed by the U.S. presidential candidates would affect supply chain operations.

Jon Anders Wiken via Adobe Stock

Assessing the U.S. election impact on supply chain policy

For both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the revival of domestic manufacturing is a key campaign theme and centerpiece in their respective proposals for economic growth and national security. Amid the electioneering and campaign pledges, however, the centrality of supply chain policy is being lost in the shuffle. While both candidates want to make the supply chain less dependent on China and to rebuild the American industrial base, their approaches will impact manufacturing, allied sectors, and global supply chains much differently despite the common overlay of protectionist industrial policy.

Both Trump’s “America First” and Harris’ “Opportunity Economy” policies call for moving home parts of supply chains, like those that bring to market critical products like semiconductors, pharmaceutical products, and medical supplies, and strengthening long-term supply chain resilience by discouraging offshoring. Harris’ economic plan, dubbed the “New Way Forward,” aims to close tax loopholes, strengthen labor rights, and provide government support to high-priority sectors, such as semiconductors and green energy technologies. Trump’s economic plan, dubbed “New American Industrialism,” emphasizes tariffs, corporate tax cuts, and easing of regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less