Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Reverse logistics struggles amidst supply chain delays and growing fraud

Despite today's radically different reverse landscape, retailers have significant opportunities to stop the bleeding and recover lost profits while keeping consumers happy.

Driver and warehouse shortages combined with historic return rates and opportunistic scammers have conjured up the perfect storm for retailers this post-holiday season. Retailers have never excelled at reverse logistics, but the e-commerce holiday shopping boom combined with the worldwide pandemic has only exacerbated the struggle. With a supply chain in crisis and rising returns, retailers must also deal with a precipitous increase in fraudulent activity.

Despite today's radically different reverse landscape, organizations continue operating in a pre-pandemic capacity, accepting returns anytime, anywhere, while stopping short of re-imagining their returns management policies. Fortunately, retailers have significant opportunities to stop the bleeding and recover lost profits while keeping consumers happy.


Supply chain delays and labor shortages 

Even before the pandemic, returns were on the rise due to increased online shopping, which yields two to three times the amount compared to in-store purchases. As a result, transportation companies started routing more small parcel packages and less than truckload orders over the last few years. This increased demand has required shippers to increase capacities with limited drivers– a recipe that has led to premium price hikes. What's worse is the routes have been historically inefficient, forcing truckers to make multiple stops to bring the items back to the store for inspection and then around the country to a series of consolidation centers, returns centers, and in some cases, to the original manufacturers. 

The reverse logistics network is even more stressed today with such a shaky foundation. Online sales grew 11.3% this holiday season to reach $218.9 billion. At a conservative 20.8% return rate, logistics providers will need to manage $45.5 billion worth of merchandise. Yet the American Trucking Association predicts the industry is at least 80,000 drivers short of what they need. Driver deficits combined with inefficient reverse routing procedures mean consumers will have to wait longer than average to receive refunds for the foreseeable future. The ATA predicts the shortage could double by 2030.

To cut the costs and improve operations, retailers have a few options: They can either optimize shipping and warehousing operations themselves or work with returns management providers to do the job. Additionally, they can reduce the number and cost of returns through better policies and customer service. 

Reducing returns with excellent customer service and enhanced policies 

Returns are a reality. But excessive returns are not, and one of the best ways to reduce the load is to provide excellent customer service before the sale occurs. Several omnichannel retailers are already making strides in this area, but more need to follow innovators like 1822 Denim. The New York-based online retailer recently launched virtual try-on technology that leverages consumer data to make size recommendations. As a result, the sustainably focused brand has reduced return rates by 48% while growing sales conversions by four times.

Another way to reduce returns is by narrowing the acceptable return window. This can seem like a scary move because most customers say they prefer at least 90-days to change their minds about a holiday purchase. Brands like Macy’s, Target and Bed Bath & Beyond have obliged because they want to inspire greater customer loyalty. Still, returns windows don’t appear to make or break purchase decisions. Despite preferring three months to return items, customers do not indicate it as the most critical factor in determining where to spend their money.  

On the other hand, extended returns windows absolutely cost retailers significant profits. Why? A winter jacket returned in March, is valued much lower than one returned in January while still in season.  

This marks a notable opportunity for major retailers to reconsider their lax 90-day policies and recover lost profits without fear of losing loyalty. In fact, 39% of retailers already have 30-day returns policies, and customers are ok with it. And a handful of online-only brands, like The RealReal and thredUP, have reduced the time frame further to 14 days, allowing them to receive unwanted items faster and get the highest resale value. 

Reducing profit loss by optimizing shipping and warehousing 

Like the examples above, every retailer should have the desire to reduce their returns, but they should also be looking into optimizing their returns management strategies. Let's face it; most organizations haven't changed much about their reverse operations over the last few years, and time and money are certainly factors. Instead, retailers focus on what they excel at – sales. The best course of action at this point is to outsource operations to companies that exist for the sole purpose of solving the multifaceted returns problem. 

The best returns providers should have a network of processing facilities in locations close to their stores. These strategically placed returns centers would ensure that items are routed quickly and directly to the correct location, reducing transportation time, processing time, and costs. Returns providers should also have solid partnerships with transportation companies to negotiate reduced fees and ship as few partial loads as possible to further optimize savings. 

Scammers exacerbating the problem

The post-holiday season is arguably the single largest time of returns during the year, but that doesn’t mean that scammers aren’t at the ready at other times. At this time of year specifically, the sheer volume of returns flooding retailers’ warehouses and stores is massive. Retailers are trying to process product as fast as possible to maintain a stable flow and prevent their warehouses from getting clogged up with items. Additionally, with the labor shortages and staff working around the clock to process returns, there are windows of opportunity that scammers continuously take advantage of. 

When retailers take a structured approach to reducing their returns rates, that effort has the added benefit of minimizing the inevitable accompanying fraud. Return fraud has intensified with the massive amounts of shopping online due to Covid-19. And with that, both increased foot traffic and e-commerce traffic inevitably bring opportunities for bad actors to target stores and take advantage of their lenient policies. Today, more than two-thirds of retailers said the pandemic increased their organization's overall risk, and 57 percent indicated a rise in organized retail crime.

A recent report calculated that retailers lost $23.2 billion, or a whopping 10.6 percent of overall returns, to fraudsters this holiday season. When you add ancillary processing costs, like shipping, inspecting, and disposing of fraudulent returns, Signifyd estimates an aggregate loss of $43 billion.

Fortunately, retailers can significantly reduce fraud with better returns policy and fraud monitoring technology. 

Better returns policies

Returns policies are one of the most significant determining factors for how much fraud a retailer will face. Organizations that offer lenient terms and various returns methods, like No-ID and contactless, provide ample scam opportunities. Additionally, retailers that accept every low value return regardless of whether it makes financial sense, further exacerbate the problem. Retailers can mitigate this by using data to understand customer purchasing preferences and how they return items. Retailers can also educate customers on the environmental impact of their return habits, with the intent to discourage customers from making unnecessary returns. 

Of course, seamless policies are essential to garner brand loyalty, but retailers must start creating logical rules that support their business and their customers simultaneously. 

Simple returns requirements should entail:

  • Only accepting returns with a receipt, ID, and matching payment method.
  • Ensuring that all tags are intact and inspecting the item before issuing a refund 
  • Only processing refunds using the original payment 
  • Setting a deadline for returns between 30 and 90 days.
  • Monitoring customers that engage in excessive returns and restricting their future purchases

On the other hand, retailers can look out for a few things to ensure what they’re receiving is not fraudulent, including: items that are different than what was originally purchased; customers swapping items for the same model but different serial numbers; returns of items that have been gutted out (removed hardware components); returned empty packages; returns that have been claimed as returned, but never were.

Bringing technology into the mix

NRF reported that more than half of retailers are allocating more resources toward fraud prevention technology today, while another 50 percent are explicitly investing in machine learning and AI systems for loss prevention. In addition, intelligent retailers are partnering with returns management companies equipped with fraud monitoring technology and processes.  

Returns management providers will occasionally receive returned electronics with missing parts. When this happens, using tracking software to investigate the issue is a great first step. In one recent case, we received a dissected smartphone and followed the IP address to the scammer's eBay storefront. The software we use allowed us to flag suspicious accounts and ensures that purchases from known scammers in the future won’t get through. Similar industry technology can also monitor consumer trends and flag suspicious customers using intelligent software. Such tech can monitor individual behaviors and then recommend actions to take to prevent fraudulent purchases and returns. This happens in real-time behind the scenes. 

Additionally, retailers can minimize returns fraud by investing in top-level identification software, which allows them to verify customers' identities and implement "red flag" alerts for issues like inconsistent billing and shipping information–right from the point of sale. Advanced POS systems are the first line of defense for both online and in-store purchases.

The bottom line

After riding high from the recent holiday sales spikes, retailers must face the grim reality that returns season is in full swing. Coupled with transportation costs, labor shortages, and multi-billion-dollar fraud losses, retailers may face record-breaking losses coupled with irritated customers who are waiting to receive their refund. Yet, amidst these hard truths, returns management providers, coupled with common-sense changes, can make a significant difference.  


Recent

More Stories

digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could have been $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a campaign button that says, "Supply Chain Issues" lays on top of a U.S. flag.

Supply chain professionals should be aware of how the different policies proposed by the U.S. presidential candidates would affect supply chain operations.

Jon Anders Wiken via Adobe Stock

Assessing the U.S. election impact on supply chain policy

For both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the revival of domestic manufacturing is a key campaign theme and centerpiece in their respective proposals for economic growth and national security. Amid the electioneering and campaign pledges, however, the centrality of supply chain policy is being lost in the shuffle. While both candidates want to make the supply chain less dependent on China and to rebuild the American industrial base, their approaches will impact manufacturing, allied sectors, and global supply chains much differently despite the common overlay of protectionist industrial policy.

Both Trump’s “America First” and Harris’ “Opportunity Economy” policies call for moving home parts of supply chains, like those that bring to market critical products like semiconductors, pharmaceutical products, and medical supplies, and strengthening long-term supply chain resilience by discouraging offshoring. Harris’ economic plan, dubbed the “New Way Forward,” aims to close tax loopholes, strengthen labor rights, and provide government support to high-priority sectors, such as semiconductors and green energy technologies. Trump’s economic plan, dubbed “New American Industrialism,” emphasizes tariffs, corporate tax cuts, and easing of regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less
AMRs and a drone operate in a warehouse environment. Overlaid are blue lines and data indicating that they are all connected digitally.

Future warehouse success depends on robot interoperability.

Image created by Yingyaipumi via Adobe Stock.

The Urgent Call for Warehouse Robotics Interoperability

Interest in warehouse robotics remains high, driven by labor pressures and a general desire to further automate distribution processes. Likewise, the number of robot makers also continues to grow. By one count, more than 50 providers exhibited at the big MODEX show in Atlanta in March 2024.

In distribution environments, there is especially strong interest in autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) for collaborative order picking. In this application, the AMR meets pickers at the right inventory location, and the workers then place picks in totes on the robot, which then moves on to another location/picker or off to packing, greatly reducing human travel time.

Keep ReadingShow less