Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

The high cost of fuel

Diesel has become a greater component of freight cost and carrier profits across all modes.

The topic of fuel prices has been on the forefront of most people’s mind lately. We have seen historic highs in fuel prices recently and this expense effects not only our daily lives by eating into discretionary income – but as the second largest cost – it affects the transportation industry profoundly. Diesel has become a greater component of freight cost and carrier profits across all modes.  

Chart, line chart\n\nDescription automatically generated


Since February of this year, the price of fuel has continually been rising, resulting in record high numbers. Looking back to just last June, the average price of fuel was $3.16 whereas this June hit $5.03 - although we have experienced some relief in July with the average of $4.67 per gallon. What does this mean for the shipper?

For the shipper this means that the overall cost of logistics and transportation has increased greatly and without the ability to predict increases. Additionally, it means that shippers should become increasingly wary of carriers that use fuel as a profit source. While companies might have budgeted for the anticipated annual increases that occur, most have not prepared themselves for the drastic and unpredictable increases the industry has experienced in the past year.

Most ground carriers base their fuel surcharges on the weekly national average diesel price that is supplied by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Each carrier has their own fuel surcharge tariff and many carriers have made changes to their fuel tariffs this year. In today’s LTL market, more than 1/3 of a basic invoice is the cost of the fuel surcharge. In fact, LTL carriers rely heavily on fuel as the primary source of profits. In Truckload about half of the invoice will be driven by fuel. Ground parcel fuel surcharge more than doubled YOY for both carriers, 131% and 116% increase for FedEx and UPS respectively, rising far faster than the indices. 

Air services too have seen big changes. In April of this year, FedEx changed their fuel surcharge for the second time since late last year and UPS followed immediately. In the graph below, the red line shows the actual air fuel surcharge FedEx implemented. If FedEx had chosen to not make these changes, the fuel surcharge shippers would pay today would be the orange dotted line, 3.5% lower than what it is currently. 

Chart, histogram\n\nDescription automatically generated  

As gas prices increased, carriers have found it to be justifiable to raise their own fuel surcharge. Along with the General Rate Increases and other surcharge increases (yes, fuel surcharge applies to other parcel surcharges too), this could become a significant unplanned issue in a shipper’s budget.     

So, what can a shipper do to “soften the blow”? They will first need to know their spend and understand how it changes overtime. The best advice is to seek help from experts on this matter who can help model and mitigate the increases before it breaks your business model.

Recent

More Stories

digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could have been $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less
AMRs and a drone operate in a warehouse environment. Overlaid are blue lines and data indicating that they are all connected digitally.

Future warehouse success depends on robot interoperability.

Image created by Yingyaipumi via Adobe Stock.

The Urgent Call for Warehouse Robotics Interoperability

Interest in warehouse robotics remains high, driven by labor pressures and a general desire to further automate distribution processes. Likewise, the number of robot makers also continues to grow. By one count, more than 50 providers exhibited at the big MODEX show in Atlanta in March 2024.

In distribution environments, there is especially strong interest in autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) for collaborative order picking. In this application, the AMR meets pickers at the right inventory location, and the workers then place picks in totes on the robot, which then moves on to another location/picker or off to packing, greatly reducing human travel time.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supply chain network

My Industry ICONS (Intelligently Curated Orchestration Networks)

The second annual 3 V’s of Supply Chain Innovation Awards Contest is in full flight at CSCMP’s EDGE Conference, recognizing companies that have used the 3 V’s Framework (variability, visibility, and velocity) to achieve success.

I’m repeatedly asked, which companies use their supply chain networks as their anchor of corporate competitiveness, embracing variability, harnessing visibility, and competing with velocity?

Keep ReadingShow less