Raymond Corp. boosts energy solutions with new battery plant
Forklift maker solidifies its commitment to producing lithium-ion batteries and supporting U.S. manufacturing with its newest factory in Upstate New York.
The Raymond Corp. has expanded its energy storage solutions business with the opening of a manufacturing plant that will produce lithium-ion and thin plate pure lead (TPPL) batteries for its forklifts and other material handling equipment. Located in Binghamton, N.Y., Raymond’s Energy Solutions Manufacturing Center of Excellence adds to the more than 100-year-old company’s commitment to supporting the local economy and reinvigorating Upstate New York as an innovation hub, according to company officials and local government and business leaders who gathered for a ribbon cutting and grand opening this week.
“This region has a rich history of innovation,” Jennifer Lupo, Raymond’s vice president of energy solutions, supply chain, and leasing, said in welcoming attendees to the ribbon cutting ceremony Monday.
Lupo referred to the new factory as an “exciting milestone” in Raymond’s history and described it as the next step in the company’s energy storage solutions business, which began nearly 10 years ago with the development of a lithium-ion battery to power its “walkie” pallet jack. That work has expanded to include larger batteries and other technologies to support battery-electric equipment.
“We’re not just keeping up with the electrification movement,” Lupo said. “We’re leading it.”
Raymond, a business unit of Toyota Material Handling, has been building forklifts, pallet jacks, and other material handling equipment at its nearby Greene, New York, headquarters since 1922. The Binghamton factory supports local efforts to boost manufacturing and innovation in New York’s Southern Tier, which was recently designated as a regional technology and innovation hub by the Biden Administration.
Raymond is leasing the 124,000 square foot facility at 196 Corporate Drive, situated in an established industrial park. The manufacturer is currently utilizing just 10,000 square feet of the space to produce its 8250 lithium-ion battery, which can power Raymond’s class 1 and class 2 fork trucks, as well as a smaller TPPL battery for powering pallet jacks.
The Binghamton factory employs 15 people, but the company expects to scale up quickly in space and personnel, adding 12 to 25 employees next year and ramping up to 60 employees by 2027, according to Jim Priestly, battery manufacturing manager for energy solutions at Raymond.
The Binghamton facility also represents Raymond’s larger commitment to helping develop greener, more sustainable supply chains, according to company President and CEO Michael Field.
“We recognize energy’s critical role in shaping our future,” Field told attendees at the grand opening, adding that Raymond is seizing the opportunity to participate in the clean energy transition locally and beyond.
“This facility is just the beginning,” Field said.
Third-party logistics (3PL) providers’ share of large real estate leases across the U.S. rose significantly through the third quarter of 2024 compared to the same time last year, as more retailers and wholesalers have been outsourcing their warehouse and distribution operations to 3PLs, according to a report from real estate firm CBRE.
Specifically, 3PLs’ share of bulk industrial leasing activity—covering leases of 100,000 square feet or more—rose to 34.1% through Q3 of this year from 30.6% through Q3 last year. By raw numbers, 3PLs have accounted for 498 bulk leases so far this year, up by 9% from the 457 at this time last year.
By category, 3PLs’ share of 34.1% ranked above other occupier types such as: general retail and wholesale (26.6), food and beverage (9.0), automobiles, tires, and parts (7.9), manufacturing (6.2), building materials and construction (5.6), e-commerce only (5.6), medical (2.7), and undisclosed (2.3).
On a quarterly basis, bulk leasing by 3PLs has steadily increased this year, reversing the steadily decreasing trend of 2023. CBRE pointed to three main reasons for that resurgence:
Import Flexibility. Labor disruptions, extreme weather patterns, and geopolitical uncertainty have led many companies to diversify their import locations. Using 3PLs allows for more inventory flexibility, a key component to retailer success in times of uncertainty.
Capital Allocation/Preservation. Warehousing and distribution of goods is expensive, draining capital resources for transportation costs, rent, or labor. But outsourcing to 3PLs provides companies with more flexibility to increase or decrease their inventories without any risk of signing their own lease commitments. And using a 3PL also allows companies to switch supply chain costs from capital to operational expenses.
Focus on Core Competency. Outsourcing their logistics operations to 3PLs allows companies to focus on core business competencies that drive revenue, such as product development, sales, and customer service.
Looking into the future, these same trends will continue to drive 3PL warehouse demand, CBRE said. Economic, geopolitical and supply chain uncertainty will remain prevalent in the coming quarters but will not diminish the need to effectively manage inventory levels.
Supply chains are subjected to constant change, and the most recent five years have forced supply chain professionals to navigate unprecedented issues, adapt to shifting demand patterns, and deal with unanticipated volatility and, to some extent, “black swan” events.
As a result, change management has become an essential capability to help improve supply chain operations, support collaboration both internally and with external partners, deploy new technology, and adapt to sometimes continually changing market pressures. Recognizing this importance, the 2025 Annual Third-Party Logistics Study (www.3PLStudy.com) took an in-depth look at change management. The majority of respondents to the study’s global survey—61% of shippers and 73% of 3PLs—reported that the need for supply chain change management is either critical or significant.
Shippers says that the biggest drivers of change in their supply chain organizations are customer demands, economic factors, and technological advancements.
2025 Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
Figure 1 above focuses on several factors that were identified as likely drivers of change in supply chains. Among shippers, the biggest drivers of change in their supply chain organizations included customer demands, economic factors, and technological advancements. Other factors included supplier considerations, societal shifts, and labor restraints. 3PL responses were similar to shippers’ except 3PLs ranked labor restraints as the fourth most important driver of change.
The study also asked respondents to identify areas in need of change. The most-identified area was supply chain visibility, cited by 69% of shippers and 68% of 3PLs. Technology, planning, and relationships also ranked highly.
Respondents also reported varying degrees of receptivity to change. About one-fourth of shippers and 3PLs said they are extremely receptive to change, while 45% of shippers and 53% of 3PLs said their organizations are moderately receptive to change.
AI underscores need for change management
Most supply chain professionals agree that the need to embrace change is likely to continue to increase. Technology is advancing rapidly, and artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are creating new opportunities to increase efficiency, improve decision-making, and optimize operations within the supply chain.
Among the many pertinent messages that received attention at the 2024 CSCMP EDGE Supply Chain Conference and Exhibition was that nearly every aspect of the supply chain will be involved with or impacted by AI. Example areas where significant improvements and results may be achieved include demand forecasting, inventory management, warehouse operations, predictive equipment maintenance, supplier relationship management, and more. As a result, AI may bring change to nearly every aspect of supply chain management and every level of employee.
This year’s 3PL study also focused on the growing role of AI in supply chains. Shippers and 3PLs are aligned on the top use cases for AI, with supply and demand forecasting and transportation and route optimization ranking at the top. Order management also ranked highly for both groups, while 3PLs see a slightly higher use case for warehouse automation than do shippers.
Both groups are also aligned on their view of AI as a tool that can automate data analysis, identify patterns, solve problems, and automate repetitive and mundane tasks. The hope is that AI will help companies better use their data to make improved and informed decisions. AI can process data and identify patterns and repetitive operational issues faster than a human can, which can improve forecasting, uncover inefficiencies, optimize processes, make predictions, and increase resiliency. Machine learning, a subset of AI, is expected to be especially useful for solving complex logistics problems by refining its predictions and recommendations over time to create more efficient operations.
Shippers and 3PLs agree that the greatest return on investment from AI will come from service-level improvements—cited by 40% of shippers and 37% of 3PLs—as well as data accuracy, cited by 34% of shippers and 39% of 3PLs.
Given the potential benefits of AI, shippers will increasingly be looking for 3PLs that offer AI solutions that they can use to achieve reliable results and gain a competitive advantage. Nearly three-quarters of shippers said 3PLs’ use of AI would influence their choice of a 3PL partner. On a more granular basis, 13% of shippers reported that they are very likely to switch 3PL providers based on their AI capabilities, 29% said they are likely, and 32% said they are somewhat likely to switch 3PL providers based on their AI capabilities. As demand for AI-based solutions increases, 3PL offerings will evolve, further exacerbating the change that supply chain organizations are experiencing.
Realizing benefits from change management
While the ability to manage change is critical to survival, so too is the ability to determine when change may be needed. To determine whether they need to change, companies should start by assessing their current state and opportunities for improvement. Next, they need to identify the desired state and benefits of change. To help drive success, the change management strategy should create a vision, identify solutions, and develop a plan for change.
For successful change to occur, stakeholders must work together to operate as a systematic supply chain rather than working as individuals with departmental goals that may not align. It is also critical to gain support for the change initiative among those who may be involved. Educating stakeholders about the need for change, creating a clear vision of what the change will accomplish, and outlining the benefits can help build support.
Many companies have found that using a structured change management process can reduce resistance to change, improve communication, and increase the likelihood of success. In the study, 58% of shippers and 76% of 3PLs reported using a change management framework. The two most frequently cited frameworks used by both shippers and 3PLs were the McKinsey 7-S (which identifies seven factors that influence an organization’s ability to change) and the ADKAR change management model (awareness, desire, knowledge, ability, and reinforcement). Use of an in-house proprietary system was cited by 36% of shippers and 29% of 3PLs.
The good news for those in supply chain is that key stakeholders are dedicated to minimizing disruptions, enhancing agility, and ensuring long-term success. In this year’s study, 89% of shippers reported that they are committed to the success of the broader, end-to-end (E2E) supply chain. It is clear that shippers sense a deep commitment to the broader concept of supply chain management and recognize the need to align themselves with multiple supply chain participants to create value for their end-user customers and consumers. What’s more, 64% of shippers reported that their 3PLs share this commitment to the E2E concept, and 69% indicated that some of their 3PLs are involved with their change management processes. Also encouraging is that 77% of shippers agree that their 3PLs are enthusiastic about joint efforts relating to change management.
In the complex and ever-evolving world of supply chains, change is inevitable. With effective change management practices in place, shippers and 3PLs can navigate these changes with greater confidence and turn them into opportunities for growth and improvement.
The logistics process automation provider Vanderlande has agreed to acquire Siemens Logistics for $325 million, saying its specialty in providing value-added baggage and cargo handling and digital solutions for airport operations will complement Netherlands-based Vanderlande’s business in the warehousing, airports, and parcel sectors.
According to Vanderlande, the global logistics landscape is undergoing significant change, with increasing demand for efficient, automated systems. Vanderlande, which has a strong presence in airport logistics, said it recognizes the evolving trends in the sector and sees tremendous potential for sustained growth. With passenger travel on the rise and airports investing heavily in modernization, the long-term market outlook for airport automation is highly positive.
To meet that growing demand, the proposed transaction will significantly enhance customer value by providing accelerated access to advanced technologies, improving global presence for better local service, and creating further customer value through synergies in technology development, Vanderlande said.
In a statement, Nuremberg, Germany-based Siemens Logistics said that merging with Vanderlande would “have no operational impact on ongoing or new projects,” but that it would offer its current customers and employees significant development and value-add potential.
"As a distinguished provider of solutions for airport logistics, Siemens Logistics enjoys a first-class reputation in the baggage and air-cargo handling areas. Together with Vanderlande and our committed global teams, we look forward to bringing fresh impetus to the airport industry and to supporting our customers' business with future-oriented technologies," Michael Schneider, CEO of Siemens Logistics, said in a release.
Five material handling companies have merged into a single entity, forming an Elgin, Illinois-based company called “Systems in Motion” that will function as a tier-one, turnkey material handling integrator, the members said.
The initiative is the culmination of the companies’ close working relationship for the past five years and represents their unified strength. “We recognized that going to market under a cadre of names was not helping our customers understand our complete turn-key services and approach,” Scott Lee, CEO of Systems in Motion, said in a release. “Operating as one voice, and one company, Systems in Motion will move forward to continue offering superior industrial automation.”
Systems in Motion provides material handling systems for warehousing, fulfillment, distribution, and manufacturing companies. The firm plans to complete a rebranded web site in January of 2025.
Keep ReadingShow less
Future warehouse success depends on robot interoperability.
Interest in warehouse robotics remains high, driven by labor pressures and a general desire to further automate distribution processes. Likewise, the number of robot makers also continues to grow. By one count, more than 50 providers exhibited at the big MODEX show in Atlanta in March 2024.
In distribution environments, there is especially strong interest in autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) for collaborative order picking. In this application, the AMR meets pickers at the right inventory location, and the workers then place picks in totes on the robot, which then moves on to another location/picker or off to packing, greatly reducing human travel time.
While the use of robots in distribution is still early in its maturity, for many, if not most, companies, the future is one of heterogeneous robots—different types of bots from different vendors operating in a given facility. With the growth in robotics, these different robots will often need to communicate with each other—either directly or indirectly through use of an integration platform—to automate the flow of information and work. This is broadly termed “interoperability,” and it is an important concept for companies planning warehouse robotics initiatives, with the ultimate goal of achieving a “plug and play” environments where new robots can easily be added to the automation mix and processes adapted over time.
Interoperability example
Why is interoperability important?
Consider the following example. A company buys perhaps 20 AMRs to support collaborative picking. A few years later, additional AMRs are needed to support growth. But now there is another AMR from a different vendor that the company prefers for cost, design, change in stock keeping unit (SKU) attributes, or other factors.
Interoperability will allow a company to keep the AMRs they have and seamlessly add the new AMRs to the mix. Beyond basic integration, a company will want to manage the robots across both vendors in terms of visibility, task assignment, performance measurement, and more, operating as if it’s a single fleet.
That’s a good example of what interoperability is all about.
Are there interoperability standards?
There are some initiatives across the robotics sector to develop cross-vendor integration protocols that will make interoperability much easier. However, these standards, such as VDA5050 (a standardized interface for automated guided vehicles) and the Mass Robotics 2.0 AMR Interoperability Standard, are either not widely used or are still under development.
Many vendors have also started offering support for what is called a “robot operating system” (ROS/ROS2). However, this is a loose, open source framework (not a full standard) that doesn’t fully address the interoperability challenge.
The robotics platform alternative
In the absence of useful standards, companies still have a few options for achieving interoperability. One is the traditional approach of manually programming interfaces between different robots and interfaces between robots and software systems such as warehouse management (WMS) or warehouse execution systems (WES).
The downsides of this approach are well understood. They include extended developing times and the high cost to get the integrations done, as well as a significant lack of flexibility down the road, with some added risk thrown into the mix as well.
A better alternative is the use of a platform strategy. Which begs the question: What is a robotics platform?
A robotics software platform is a middleware ecosystem—cloud-based or on-premise—that provides various capabilities and services from integration to fulfillment planning and execution. It also acts as a bridge between automation systems and various enterprise software applications.
The starting point for any robotic platform success is, in fact, integration. That integration capability includes advanced tools that enable flexible “no code/low code” approaches to connecting robot fleets.
The right platform can also more rapidly integrate with WMS/WES or other software applications, using AI to greatly accelerate the often time-consuming data-mapping process. Once the WMS/WES is connected to the platform, then the robots are also connected to enable real-time, bidirectional access to the WMS/WES data.
Such a platform delivers interoperability across robot types and connects different automated processes. A simple example would be a communication from the platform to a robot needed to move goods from receiving to reserve storage, where another robot is made aware via the platform that there is a new putaway task ready for completion.
Other interoperability considerations
To maximize interoperability opportunities, companies should consider the following interoperability-related capabilities that may be available from a given robotics platform:
Flexibility in integration based on robot software functionality: Different robot vendors come with software at different levels of maturity. An interoperability platform should be able to work with robotic vendors at any level of software functional capability, ensuring flexibility in robot selection.
User experience consistency: For interoperability to be functionally effective, the user interface across robotic-enabled processes should be consistent, so that users can easily interact and switch between different tasks.
Flexible communication protocols: A platform should provide support for a wide range of different protocols, such as application programming interfaces (APIs), socket communication (a two-way communication link between a server and a client program), web services, ROS/ROS2.0, and VDA5050, to name just a few.
Observability: AMRs especially will generate huge of amount of data on their movements and activities that can be used for analytics. The robotics platform should normalize data packets from different vendors to create a unified dashboard.
Safety and risk mitigation: A robotics platform can help achieve safety across different types of robots by understanding the safety protocols of different machines and coming up with a common set of rules. These rules will exist in an extended fleet manager that runs in the platform and sits on top of the fleet managers of each individual brand of AMR.
While some of these capabilities may not be relevant in a company’s early years in warehouse robotics, they could prove valuable down the road, so give them some consideration today.
Interoperability use cases
We’ve already covered a couple of common robotic interoperability use cases:
Adding new robots of the same type but from a different vendor and having all of them operate together as a single fleet.
Connecting different types of robots or automation to support multi-step process flows (for example, receiving to putaway).
Here is another: One global consumer goods company wants to heavily automate distribution processes but give individual regions or countries they operate in the flexibility to select the vendor for a specific type of robot (for example, a layer picker) and be able to easily plug that specific equipment into the larger platform infrastructure. This allows a centralized automation strategy with local execution.
The Interoperability Imperative
For a significant and growing number of companies, the future on the distribution center floor will be robotics of multiple types and vendors. To maximize flow and productivity, these heterogeneous environments must adopt interoperability strategies, enabling systems of different types to operate as if a single fleet. While standards to help with all this may arrive in future, for now a robotics integration and execution platform will provide an attractive alternative to traditional programming-heavy approaches.